CVE-2025-12082VulnerabilityPublished 29 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-12082: Drupal CivicTheme Design System · Incorrect Authorization

Affects Drupal CivicTheme Design SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 23% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Drupal CivicTheme Design System	Affected =0.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediately inventory all Drupal installations to identify the use of the CivicTheme Design System and its version. 2. Apply updates to CivicTheme Design System version 1.12.0 or later as soon as they become available from Drupal to remediate the authorization flaw. 3. Until patches are applied, implement strict web server or application-level access controls to restrict access to sensitive resources, including IP whitelisting or VPN-only access where feasible. 4. Conduct thorough access control audits and penetration testing focusing on forceful browsing attempts to identify and remediate similar authorization weaknesses. 5. Monitor web server logs and intrusion detection systems for unusual access patterns indicative of forceful browsing or unauthorized resource access. 6. Educate development and security teams about secure authorization practices and the risks of improper access control enforcement. 7. Consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to block suspicious URL patterns or unauthorized access attempts targeting CivicTheme components.

Description

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal CivicTheme Design System allows Forceful Browsing.This issue affects CivicTheme Design System: from 0.0.0 before 1.12.0.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk of unauthorized data exposure, especially for entities using Drupal CivicTheme Design System in their public-facing or internal web applications. Confidential information, including user data, internal documents, or proprietary content, could be accessed by attackers without authentication. This could lead to privacy violations under GDPR, reputational damage, and potential regulatory penalties. The vulnerability's remote and unauthenticated exploitability increases the attack surface, making it attractive for opportunistic attackers and advanced persistent threats targeting European institutions, government websites, and enterprises. The lack of impact on integrity and availability reduces the risk of service disruption or data manipulation but does not diminish the severity of confidentiality breaches. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and public administration are particularly vulnerable due to the sensitivity of their data and the widespread use of Drupal in these sectors.

CWE-863Incorrect Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #17OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

drupal.org/sa-contrib-2025-112 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Nov 2025, 02:15 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-863

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats