Threats Tagged 'cwe-863'
View all threats tagged with 'cwe-863'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cwe-863'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
CVE-2026-71381: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in Adobe Adobe Genuine Software Integrity ServiceCVE-2026-71381 0 Adobe Genuine Software Integrity Service was affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could have leveraged this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized limited write access. Exploitation of this issue did not require user interaction, but required the attacker to have access to the local environment the application is installed on. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/07/2026, 20:26:30 UTC Added: 08/07/2026, 20:56:45 UTC |
CVE-2026-17594: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3CVE-2026-17594 0 Nexus Repository 3 CE/Pro versions 3.0.0 through 3.94.x contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) in the repository-creation user interface. An individual user account holding a delegated repository-admin privilege scoped to a specific repository format could create a repository of a different, unauthorized format, because authorization was checked against one request field while a separate, attacker-controlled field determined the repository format actually created. This does not affect the anonymous user, which cannot hold this privilege by default. Fixed in version 3.95.0. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/07/2026, 16:07:43 UTC Added: 08/07/2026, 16:26:45 UTC |
CVE-2026-71433: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in langchain-ai langgraphCVE-2026-71433 0 LangGraph Checkpoint Postgres and SQLite Checkpoint are the Postgres and SQLite implementations of LangGraph's checkpoint saver. Prior to 3.1.1, the langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite packages persisted hierarchical namespaces as a dot joined string and scoped reads by matching that string as a simple prefix pattern, so a read scoped to one namespace could also match a sibling namespace whose flattened form shares the same leading characters, or a namespace label containing unescaped pattern metacharacters, allowing an authenticated caller to retrieve stored items belonging to another tenant or user through an ordinary scoped search or list namespaces call, with no crafted input required. This issue is fixed in versions 3.1.1 of langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/06/2026, 19:03:09 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 22:13:33 UTC |
CVE-2026-48076: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in open-reception appointment-booking-softwareCVE-2026-48076 0 OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to `tenantId`, `tunnelId`, `clientPublicKey`, and `emailHash`, but never to `channelId`. The `bootstrap-challenge` request schema does not even accept a `channelId`, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function `createNewClientWithAppointment` checks only `channel.archived = false`. The `channel.isPublic` check that protects `addAppointmentToTunnel` is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the `create-new-client` payload with `channelId` pointing to a private (`isPublic = false`) channel. The booking lands as `CONFIRMED` if the target channel has `requiresConfirmation = false` (the default), otherwise as `NEW`. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (`/api/public/channels` correctly filters `isPublic = true`), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/06/2026, 20:43:59 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 22:13:24 UTC |
CVE-2026-48074: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in open-reception appointment-booking-softwareCVE-2026-48074 0 OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.6, when a TENANT_ADMIN deletes an existing staff user, the underlying `StaffService.deleteStaffMember()` runs an additional invite cleanup that deletes from the central `user_invite` table by email. The `email` clause has no `tenantId` predicate. Any pending invite in any tenant that shares the deleted staff's email is removed. A TENANT_ADMIN of tenant A who deletes a staff record with email `victim[@]example[.]com` also deletes the pending invite for `victim[@]example[.]com` in tenant B, even though they have no relationship to tenant B. The user-side delete is correctly scoped (`eq(user.id, staffId), eq(user.tenantId, tenantId)`), and the pending-invite-only delete path (when `staffId` is itself an invite ID) is also tenant-scoped. The bug is specifically in the invite cleanup that runs as a side effect of deleting an existing staff user. Version 1.0.6 patches the issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/06/2026, 20:27:21 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 22:13:24 UTC |
CVE-2025-15674: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in PasssterCVE-2025-15674 0 The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.7 does not restrict low-privilege users holding the edit_posts capability from reading globally password-protected content through the WordPress core REST API when global protection is enabled, allowing any Contributor or higher to read the content of protected pages and posts without knowing the password. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/07/2026, 00:31:13 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 22:13:06 UTC |
CVE-2026-18997: Incorrect Authorization in cosmicstack-labs mercury-agentCVE-2026-18997 0 A vulnerability in cosmicstack-labs mercury-agent up to version 1.1.12 allows remote attackers to cause incorrect authorization via manipulation of the Agent.handleBgCommand function. The issue affects the background command handler component and could lead to limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.3 and is classified as low severity. No patch or official fix has been reported yet, and the project has not responded to the issue report. Exploit code has been made public, but no known exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 08/06/2026, 04:30:10 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 18:17:13 UTC |
CVE-2026-18992: Incorrect Authorization in zhayujie CowAgentCVE-2026-18992 0 CVE-2026-18992 is a vulnerability in zhayujie CowAgent up to version 2.1.1 affecting the _select_tools function in the Self-Evolution Review Agent component. It allows remote attackers to cause incorrect authorization. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.3, indicating a moderate impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Exploit code is publicly available, but no known exploitation in the wild has been reported. No patch or official remediation information is provided. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 08/06/2026, 03:30:10 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 18:17:13 UTC |
CVE-2026-19006: Incorrect Authorization in mf-yang openclaw-cnCVE-2026-19006 0 CVE-2026-19006 is a vulnerability in mf-yang openclaw-cn 2026.2.5 affecting the Ggateway Exec Approval Flow component. It involves incorrect authorization due to manipulation in the src/agents/bash-tools.exec.ts file. The vulnerability can be exploited remotely and the exploit code has been publicly disclosed. The project has been notified but has not yet responded or issued a fix. The CVSS score is 6.3, indicating a medium severity impact. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 08/06/2026, 06:00:11 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 18:17:07 UTC |
CVE-2026-19010: Missing Authorization in TinyAGICVE-2026-19010 0 A security vulnerability exists in TinyAGI version 0.0.20 affecting the processMessage function in the Message API Endpoint. This flaw allows remote attackers to bypass authorization checks, potentially leading to unauthorized access. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.3 (medium severity). The issue was publicly disclosed and reported to the project, but no response or patch has been issued yet. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 08/06/2026, 07:00:10 UTC Added: 08/06/2026, 18:17:05 UTC |
Showing 1 to 10 of 142 results