CVE-2025-12359: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in dfactory Responsive Lightbox & Gallery
The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.3 via the 'get_image_size_by_url' function. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs when determining image dimensions for gallery items. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-12359 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 2.5.3. The root cause lies in the 'get_image_size_by_url' function, which attempts to determine image dimensions by fetching user-supplied URLs without adequate validation or sanitization. This flaw allows authenticated attackers with Author-level or higher privileges to coerce the plugin into making HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs from the server hosting the WordPress site. SSRF vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous because they can be leveraged to access internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally, such as internal APIs, metadata services, or administrative interfaces. Although the vulnerability does not require user interaction beyond authentication, it does require the attacker to have at least Author-level access, which is a moderate privilege level in WordPress. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.4 reflects a medium severity, with the vector indicating network attack vector, low attack complexity, privileges required, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality and integrity impacts but no availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability's presence in a popular WordPress plugin and the common use of WordPress in Europe make it a relevant threat. The lack of an official patch at the time of reporting increases the urgency for mitigation. Attackers could use this SSRF to perform internal reconnaissance, extract sensitive data, or potentially pivot to further attacks within the internal network. The vulnerability is cataloged under CWE-918, which covers SSRF issues due to improper validation of URLs used in server-side requests.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to websites and web applications using the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin on WordPress. The SSRF flaw can be exploited to access internal services behind firewalls, such as intranet applications, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS, Azure), or internal APIs, potentially leading to unauthorized data disclosure or manipulation. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of internal systems. Organizations with sensitive internal infrastructure exposed indirectly via vulnerable WordPress sites are at heightened risk. The medium CVSS score indicates moderate risk, but the actual impact depends on the internal network architecture and the privileges of the compromised WordPress user. Since exploitation requires Author-level access, the threat is more severe in environments where such privileges are widely granted or where credential compromise is easier. European entities with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could face compliance issues if internal data is leaked. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as a stepping stone for more advanced attacks, including lateral movement within corporate networks. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers often develop exploits post-disclosure. Organizations relying heavily on WordPress for public-facing services, especially in sectors like government, finance, and critical infrastructure, should consider this vulnerability a significant concern.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation involves restricting Author-level user privileges to trusted personnel only, minimizing the risk of exploitation. Organizations should monitor and audit user accounts with Author or higher privileges for suspicious activity. Since no official patch is available yet, consider temporarily disabling or removing the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin if feasible. Implement network-level controls to limit outbound HTTP requests from web servers to only necessary destinations, thereby reducing the SSRF attack surface. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block unusual outbound requests initiated by the web application. Additionally, hardening internal services by enforcing authentication and IP whitelisting can mitigate the impact of SSRF attempts. Regularly update WordPress and its plugins once patches are released. Employ security plugins that monitor for anomalous behavior related to SSRF or unusual URL fetches. Finally, conduct internal penetration testing to identify if internal services are accessible via SSRF and remediate accordingly.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2025-12359: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in dfactory Responsive Lightbox & Gallery
Description
The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.3 via the 'get_image_size_by_url' function. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs when determining image dimensions for gallery items. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-12359 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 2.5.3. The root cause lies in the 'get_image_size_by_url' function, which attempts to determine image dimensions by fetching user-supplied URLs without adequate validation or sanitization. This flaw allows authenticated attackers with Author-level or higher privileges to coerce the plugin into making HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs from the server hosting the WordPress site. SSRF vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous because they can be leveraged to access internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally, such as internal APIs, metadata services, or administrative interfaces. Although the vulnerability does not require user interaction beyond authentication, it does require the attacker to have at least Author-level access, which is a moderate privilege level in WordPress. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.4 reflects a medium severity, with the vector indicating network attack vector, low attack complexity, privileges required, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality and integrity impacts but no availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability's presence in a popular WordPress plugin and the common use of WordPress in Europe make it a relevant threat. The lack of an official patch at the time of reporting increases the urgency for mitigation. Attackers could use this SSRF to perform internal reconnaissance, extract sensitive data, or potentially pivot to further attacks within the internal network. The vulnerability is cataloged under CWE-918, which covers SSRF issues due to improper validation of URLs used in server-side requests.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to websites and web applications using the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin on WordPress. The SSRF flaw can be exploited to access internal services behind firewalls, such as intranet applications, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS, Azure), or internal APIs, potentially leading to unauthorized data disclosure or manipulation. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of internal systems. Organizations with sensitive internal infrastructure exposed indirectly via vulnerable WordPress sites are at heightened risk. The medium CVSS score indicates moderate risk, but the actual impact depends on the internal network architecture and the privileges of the compromised WordPress user. Since exploitation requires Author-level access, the threat is more severe in environments where such privileges are widely granted or where credential compromise is easier. European entities with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could face compliance issues if internal data is leaked. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as a stepping stone for more advanced attacks, including lateral movement within corporate networks. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers often develop exploits post-disclosure. Organizations relying heavily on WordPress for public-facing services, especially in sectors like government, finance, and critical infrastructure, should consider this vulnerability a significant concern.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation involves restricting Author-level user privileges to trusted personnel only, minimizing the risk of exploitation. Organizations should monitor and audit user accounts with Author or higher privileges for suspicious activity. Since no official patch is available yet, consider temporarily disabling or removing the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin if feasible. Implement network-level controls to limit outbound HTTP requests from web servers to only necessary destinations, thereby reducing the SSRF attack surface. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block unusual outbound requests initiated by the web application. Additionally, hardening internal services by enforcing authentication and IP whitelisting can mitigate the impact of SSRF attempts. Regularly update WordPress and its plugins once patches are released. Employ security plugins that monitor for anomalous behavior related to SSRF or unusual URL fetches. Finally, conduct internal penetration testing to identify if internal services are accessible via SSRF and remediate accordingly.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-27T16:13:08.985Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 691d6897a27e6d5e91bc16c0
Added to database: 11/19/2025, 6:49:59 AM
Last enriched: 11/26/2025, 8:04:39 AM
Last updated: 1/7/2026, 5:23:45 AM
Views: 53
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-0650: CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function in OpenFlagr Flagr
CriticalCVE-2025-15474: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in AuntyFey AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock
MediumCVE-2025-14468: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in mohammed_kaludi AMP for WP – Accelerated Mobile Pages
MediumCVE-2025-9611: CWE-749 Exposed Dangerous Method or Function in Microsoft Playwright
HighCVE-2026-22162
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.