Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-12383: CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') in Eclipse Foundation Jersey

0
Critical
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-12383cvecve-2025-12383cwe-362
Published: Tue Nov 18 2025 (11/18/2025, 15:14:37 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Eclipse Foundation
Product: Jersey

Description

In Eclipse Jersey versions 2.45, 3.0.16, 3.1.9 a race condition can cause ignoring of critical SSL configurations - such as mutual authentication, custom key/trust stores, and other security settings. This issue may result in SSLHandshakeException under normal circumstances, but under certain conditions, it could lead to unauthorized trust in insecure servers (see PoC)

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/25/2025, 16:20:36 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-12383 is a race condition vulnerability classified under CWE-362 affecting the Eclipse Foundation's Jersey library, specifically versions 2.45, 3.0.16, and 3.1.9. Jersey is a widely used open-source framework for developing RESTful web services in Java. The vulnerability arises from improper synchronization when handling SSL configurations, which include mutual authentication, custom key stores, and trust stores. Due to concurrent execution issues, critical SSL settings may be ignored, causing SSLHandshakeExceptions under normal conditions. More critically, under certain timing conditions, the race condition can lead to the acceptance of insecure or unauthorized SSL servers, effectively bypassing SSL/TLS trust validation. This undermines the confidentiality and integrity of communications, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication or user interaction but requires high attack complexity due to timing conditions. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the high CVSS 9.4 score reflects the severe impact if exploited. The flaw affects any Java applications using the vulnerable Jersey versions for secure communications, making it a significant risk for enterprise environments relying on these versions for REST API security.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-12383 is substantial. Many enterprises and public sector entities in Europe utilize Java-based microservices and REST APIs secured by Jersey. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized trust in malicious servers, exposing sensitive data to interception or manipulation. This compromises confidentiality and integrity of communications, potentially leading to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR violations), and loss of customer trust. Critical sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure are particularly vulnerable due to their reliance on secure communications. Additionally, the disruption caused by SSLHandshakeExceptions can lead to service outages or degraded performance, impacting availability. The high attack complexity somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially from well-resourced attackers. The absence of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the critical severity demands urgent action to prevent future attacks.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Upgrade Jersey to a patched version once released by the Eclipse Foundation; monitor official channels for updates. 2. Until patches are available, implement external SSL/TLS validation layers such as reverse proxies or API gateways that enforce strict certificate validation and mutual TLS. 3. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect anomalous SSL/TLS handshake behaviors. 4. Conduct thorough code reviews and testing of SSL configuration handling in applications using Jersey to identify potential race conditions. 5. Use static and dynamic analysis tools to detect concurrency issues in SSL-related code paths. 6. Enforce strict network segmentation and monitoring to detect man-in-the-middle attempts. 7. Educate development teams about concurrency risks in security-critical code. 8. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing SSL/TLS trust failures. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on layered defenses and proactive detection until official patches are deployed.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
eclipse
Date Reserved
2025-10-28T10:21:45.989Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 691c901eb718280d68a97e4c

Added to database: 11/18/2025, 3:26:22 PM

Last enriched: 11/25/2025, 4:20:36 PM

Last updated: 1/8/2026, 7:44:36 AM

Views: 2729

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats