CVE-2025-12465 identifies a Blind SQL Injection vulnerability in OpenSolution's QuickCMS, specifically in version 6.8. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special characters in SQL commands within the aFilesDelete function, which is accessible to users with high privileges. Blind SQL Injection allows an attacker to infer database information by sending crafted queries and observing application behavior, even without direct output of query results. This vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication beyond high privilege, making it particularly dangerous if an attacker gains or already holds elevated access. The vendor was notified early but has not disclosed the full scope or released patches, leaving version 6.8 confirmed vulnerable and other versions untested but potentially affected. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required beyond high privilege, no user interaction, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow attackers to extract sensitive data, modify or delete database contents, or disrupt CMS operations. No known public exploits exist yet, but the lack of patching increases risk. The vulnerability affects the core CMS functionality, which is critical for content management and data storage in many organizations. The absence of patch links necessitates immediate mitigation efforts by administrators. This vulnerability is classified under CWE-89, a common and dangerous injection flaw that has historically led to severe breaches.

For European organizations, exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information stored in QuickCMS databases, including user data, configuration details, and potentially business-critical content. Integrity of the CMS data could be compromised, allowing attackers to alter or delete content, which may disrupt business operations or damage organizational reputation. Availability could also be affected if attackers execute destructive SQL commands or cause database corruption. Organizations relying on QuickCMS for public-facing websites or internal portals may face service disruptions, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR breaches due to data exposure), and financial losses. The requirement for high privileges limits immediate remote exploitation but elevates risk if internal accounts are compromised or insider threats exist. The lack of vendor response and patches increases the window of exposure. European entities in sectors such as government, finance, healthcare, and media, which often use CMS platforms and handle sensitive data, are particularly vulnerable. The potential for lateral movement within networks after privilege escalation further exacerbates risk.

1. Immediately audit and restrict access to high-privileged accounts that can invoke the aFilesDelete function, enforcing the principle of least privilege. 2. Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization on all user inputs, especially those interacting with SQL queries, to neutralize special characters and prevent injection. 3. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious SQL injection patterns targeting QuickCMS endpoints. 4. Monitor database logs and application behavior for anomalies indicative of blind SQL injection attempts, such as unusual query patterns or timing discrepancies. 5. Isolate QuickCMS instances in segmented network zones to limit lateral movement if compromise occurs. 6. Engage with OpenSolution for updates or patches and plan for rapid deployment once available. 7. Consider upgrading or migrating to alternative CMS platforms with active security support if patching is delayed. 8. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on injection vulnerabilities. 9. Educate administrators and developers on secure coding practices and the risks of SQL injection. 10. Backup CMS databases frequently and verify restoration procedures to minimize impact of potential data corruption or deletion.