VulnerabilityPublished 10 Nov 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-12924: rymcu forest · Missing Authorization

Affects rymcu forestSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-12924, organizations should: 1) Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on authorization logic within the GlobalResult function and related banking API endpoints. 2) Implement strict role-based access controls (RBAC) or attribute-based access controls (ABAC) to ensure only authorized users can invoke sensitive functions. 3) Deploy API gateways or web application firewalls (WAFs) to monitor and restrict unauthorized API calls. 4) Continuously monitor logs for anomalous access patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Maintain an up-to-date deployment of rymcu forest by integrating continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines that promptly apply rolling release updates. 6) If possible, isolate critical banking API components behind VPNs or internal networks to reduce exposure. 7) Educate developers and security teams about the risks of missing authorization and enforce secure coding standards. 8) Engage with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates addressing this vulnerability as soon as they become available.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in rymcu forest up to de53ce79db9faa2efc4e79ce1077a302c42a1224. This issue affects the function GlobalResult of the file src/main/java/com/rymcu/forest/web/api/bank/BankController.java. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-12924 is unauthorized access to sensitive banking API functions, potentially leading to data confidentiality breaches. Attackers could remotely invoke the GlobalResult function without proper authorization, exposing financial data or enabling unauthorized operations. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, unauthorized data exposure can lead to financial fraud, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. Organizations worldwide relying on rymcu forest for banking or financial APIs face increased risk of data leaks or unauthorized transactions. The ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction increases the threat surface, especially for internet-facing API endpoints. The rolling release model may delay patch application if organizations do not maintain continuous update practices. Overall, the vulnerability could undermine trust in financial services and lead to significant operational and legal consequences if exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:19 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats