VulnerabilityPublished 13 Nov 2025Updated 15 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13115: macrozheng mall-swarm · Improper Authorization

Affects macrozheng mall-swarmSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 28% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubmacrozheng/mall-swarm`pkg:github/macrozheng/mall-swarm`Other threats	Affected 1.0.0 – 1.0.3 4 affected builds	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediately implement strict server-side authorization checks on the /order/detail/ endpoint to validate that the requesting user is authorized to access the specified orderId.
Employ parameter validation and enforce access control policies that tie orderId access to authenticated user identities or roles.
Monitor web server logs and application logs for anomalous or repeated access attempts to /order/detail/ with varying orderId values indicative of enumeration or exploitation attempts.
If possible, restrict access to the order detail API endpoint to authenticated users only, even if the original design allowed unauthenticated access.
Use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious manipulation of orderId parameters.
Conduct a thorough review of all endpoints handling sensitive data for similar authorization weaknesses.
Prepare incident response plans for potential data leakage scenarios and notify affected customers if breaches occur.
Engage with the vendor or consider migrating to alternative e-commerce platforms with better security support if no patches are forthcoming.
Regularly update and audit access control mechanisms as part of secure software development lifecycle practices.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in macrozheng mall-swarm and mall up to 1.0.3. This impacts the function detail of the file /order/detail/ of the component Order Details Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument orderId results in improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of order-related data, which may include customer personal information, purchase history, and potentially payment details if stored within order records. This can lead to privacy violations under GDPR, reputational damage, and potential regulatory fines. While the vulnerability does not allow modification or deletion of data, the confidentiality breach alone is significant for businesses handling sensitive customer information. Retailers and online marketplaces using macrozheng mall-swarm could see targeted exploitation attempts, especially given the public availability of exploits. The medium severity rating indicates moderate risk, but the ease of exploitation and lack of authentication requirements elevate concerns. Organizations may also face increased phishing or social engineering attacks leveraging leaked order data. The absence of vendor patches means organizations must rely on internal mitigations, increasing operational overhead. Overall, this vulnerability threatens customer trust and compliance posture for European e-commerce entities.

Summary

CVE-2025-13115 is an authorization vulnerability affecting macrozheng's mall-swarm and mall products up to version 1.0.3. The vulnerability resides in the Order Details Handler component, specifically in the /order/detail/ endpoint, where the orderId parameter is insufficiently validated. This improper authorization allows remote attackers to manipulate the orderId argument to access order details that they should not be authorized to view. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network with low attack complexity. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting a partial confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability effects. The vendor was notified but has not issued any patches or responses. Public exploit code is available, increasing the likelihood of exploitation. This vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive order information, potentially exposing customer data and transaction details. The lack of vendor response and patch availability increases the urgency for organizations to implement compensating controls. The flaw highlights the importance of robust access control mechanisms in e-commerce platforms to prevent unauthorized data access.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 20 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats