CVE-2025-13262VulnerabilityPublished 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13262: lsfusion platform · Path Traversal

Affects lsfusion platformSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 50% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHublsfusion/platform`pkg:github/lsfusion/platform`Other threats	Affected =6.0 =6.1	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately review and restrict access to the UploadFileRequestHandler endpoint, applying network-level controls such as IP whitelisting or VPN access where feasible. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'sid' parameter to prevent directory traversal sequences (e.g., '..', '%2e%2e'). 3. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block path traversal attempts targeting the affected endpoint. 4. Monitor server logs for unusual file access patterns or suspicious requests involving the 'sid' parameter. 5. Isolate the lsfusion platform environment to minimize potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 6. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates addressing this vulnerability as soon as they become available. 7. Conduct security assessments and penetration testing focused on file upload and path traversal vectors within the platform. 8. Educate development and operations teams about secure coding practices related to file handling and parameter validation. 9. Consider temporary disabling or limiting file upload functionalities if they are not critical to operations until a patch is applied.

Description

A vulnerability was determined in lsfusion platform up to 6.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function UploadFileRequestHandler of the file platform/web-client/src/main/java/lsfusion/http/controller/file/UploadFileRequestHandler.java. Executing manipulation of the argument sid can lead to path traversal. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Impact

For European organizations, exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data, including configuration files, credentials, or proprietary information stored on the server. This can compromise confidentiality and potentially integrity if attackers modify files. Availability impact is also possible if critical files are deleted or altered. Organizations relying on lsfusion platform for business-critical applications or handling sensitive data are at risk of data breaches and operational disruption. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the likelihood of attacks, especially in environments exposed to the internet. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations could be jeopardized if personal or sensitive data is accessed or leaked. The absence of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but the public disclosure means attackers may develop exploits rapidly. European entities with limited patch management capabilities or legacy deployments of lsfusion platform are particularly vulnerable.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Nov 2025, 06:07 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats