Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2025-13428: Google Cloud SecOps SOAR · Improper Input Validation

Affects Google Cloud SecOps SOARSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.6 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
8.6High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Clear

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 9 Dec 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Google Cloud Google Cloud SecOps SOARAffected
  • =0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Beyond ensuring that all Google Cloud SecOps SOAR instances are running version 6.3.64 or later, European organizations should implement strict role-based access controls to limit IDE role assignments only to trusted personnel. Regular audits of user roles and permissions can prevent unauthorized users from uploading potentially malicious packages. Monitoring and logging of package uploads and installation activities should be enhanced to detect anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. Network segmentation of the SOAR server can limit lateral movement if compromise occurs. Additionally, organizations should integrate runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect suspicious execution of scripts like setup.py. Conducting internal penetration tests and red team exercises simulating this attack vector can validate defenses. Finally, maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans tailored for SOAR platform compromises to enable rapid recovery.

Description

A vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an "IDE role" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise. No customer action is required. All customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…