Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-13520: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in mtcaptcha MTCaptcha WordPress Plugin

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-13520cvecve-2025-13520cwe-352
Published: Wed Jan 07 2026 (01/07/2026, 08:21:55 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: mtcaptcha
Product: MTCaptcha WordPress Plugin

Description

The MTCaptcha WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings, including sensitive values like the private key, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/07/2026, 08:53:42 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-13520 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the MTCaptcha WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to and including 2.7.2. The root cause is the absence or incorrect implementation of nonce validation on the settings update endpoint, which is intended to protect against unauthorized requests. Nonces are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and not from malicious third-party sites. Without proper nonce checks, an attacker can craft a malicious web request that, if an authenticated administrator visits or clicks on a link, causes the plugin settings to be altered without their consent. This includes sensitive parameters such as private keys, which could undermine the plugin’s security mechanisms. The vulnerability requires no prior authentication but does require user interaction (UI:R), specifically that an administrator is tricked into performing an action. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting low complexity of attack but limited impact confined to integrity (no confidentiality or availability impact). There are no known exploits in the wild yet, and no patches were listed at the time of reporting, indicating the need for vendor action. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-352, a common web security weakness related to CSRF. This issue is particularly relevant for WordPress sites using MTCaptcha for bot mitigation or spam prevention, as unauthorized changes to plugin settings could disable protections or expose sensitive keys.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential unauthorized modification of security-critical plugin settings, which could lead to degraded site security or enable further attacks such as spam, automated abuse, or bypass of CAPTCHA protections. While the vulnerability does not directly expose confidential data or cause denial of service, integrity compromise of plugin configuration can facilitate subsequent exploitation or undermine trust in the affected website. Organizations relying on MTCaptcha for user verification or anti-bot measures may face increased risk of automated attacks if private keys or settings are altered maliciously. This could affect e-commerce platforms, government portals, and other public-facing services that depend on WordPress. Additionally, the need for administrator interaction means that targeted phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability, increasing risk for organizations with less mature security awareness programs. The impact is moderate but could cascade into larger security incidents if leveraged as part of a multi-stage attack.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Monitor the MTCaptcha plugin vendor for official patches addressing this CSRF vulnerability and apply updates immediately upon release. 2. Until patches are available, restrict administrative access to trusted networks and users to reduce exposure to social engineering attacks. 3. Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious requests attempting to modify plugin settings without valid nonces. 4. Educate WordPress administrators on the risks of phishing and social engineering, emphasizing caution when clicking links or visiting untrusted sites while logged into admin accounts. 5. Consider temporarily disabling the plugin or limiting its functionality if feasible, to reduce attack surface. 6. Review and harden WordPress security configurations, including enforcing multi-factor authentication for admin accounts and limiting plugin installation privileges. 7. Conduct regular audits of plugin settings and logs to detect unauthorized changes promptly. 8. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate cross-site attack vectors that could facilitate CSRF exploitation.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-11-21T19:13:18.990Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 695e1b2fa55ed4ed998cb64e

Added to database: 1/7/2026, 8:37:03 AM

Last enriched: 1/7/2026, 8:53:42 AM

Last updated: 1/8/2026, 6:00:00 PM

Views: 10

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats