CVE-2025-14088VulnerabilityPublished 5 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-14088: ketr JEPaaS · Improper Authorization

Affects ketr JEPaaSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 14% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubzhangbuneng/The-Jepaas-platform`pkg:github/zhangbuneng/The-Jepaas-platform`Other threats	Affected =7.2.0 =7.2.1 =7.2.2 =7.2.3 =7.2.4 =7.2.5 =7.2.6 =7.2.7 =7.2.8	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-14088, organizations should prioritize updating ketr JEPaaS to a version where this vulnerability is patched once available. In the absence of an official patch, implement strict network-level access controls to restrict access to the /je/load endpoint only to trusted users and systems. Employ application-layer firewalls or reverse proxies to monitor and block suspicious manipulation of Authorization headers. Conduct thorough audits of authorization logic and ensure that all access control checks are robust and properly enforced. Enable detailed logging and monitoring of access attempts to detect potential exploitation attempts early. Engage with the vendor for guidance on interim mitigations or configuration changes that can reduce risk. Additionally, consider isolating JEPaaS instances from public networks if possible and applying the principle of least privilege to all user roles interacting with the platform. Regularly review and update security policies to incorporate lessons learned from this vulnerability.

Description

A vulnerability was determined in ketr JEPaaS up to 7.2.8. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /je/load. This manipulation of the argument Authorization causes improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Impact

The improper authorization vulnerability in ketr JEPaaS could allow remote attackers to bypass access controls and gain unauthorized access to sensitive functionalities or data within the platform. This unauthorized access could lead to limited confidentiality breaches, such as exposure of sensitive information, and potential integrity issues if attackers can manipulate data or system behavior. Availability impact is also low but possible if unauthorized actions disrupt normal operations. Since exploitation does not require user interaction or elevated privileges, the attack surface is broad, increasing the likelihood of exploitation in environments where JEPaaS is deployed. Organizations relying on JEPaaS for critical business processes may face operational risks and compliance issues if unauthorized access occurs. The absence of known active exploits currently limits immediate risk, but public disclosure means attackers could develop exploits rapidly. The impact is moderated by the limited scope and low severity of the authorization bypass, but it remains a significant concern for organizations with sensitive data or critical applications running on affected versions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:49 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats