CVE-2025-14990VulnerabilityPublished 21 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-14990: Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 31% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 21 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include implementing web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the 'viewid' parameter in /admin/view-appointment.php. 2. Conduct input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters, especially 'viewid', using parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent injection. 3. Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary to limit potential damage from exploitation. 4. Monitor logs for suspicious SQL errors or unusual query patterns indicative of injection attempts. 5. If possible, isolate the vulnerable application in a segmented network zone to reduce exposure. 6. Engage with the vendor or development team to obtain or develop a patch addressing the vulnerability. 7. Educate administrators on the risks and signs of exploitation to enable rapid incident response. 8. Regularly back up critical data to enable recovery in case of data tampering or loss.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin/view-appointment.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument viewid results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive customer data such as personal details and appointment records. This compromises confidentiality and integrity of the data. Attackers could also modify or delete records, disrupting business operations and availability of the service. Since the vulnerability requires no authentication and can be exploited remotely, it poses a significant risk of automated or mass exploitation. For organizations, this could result in data breaches, regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and operational downtime. Small and medium-sized businesses using this beauty parlor management system may lack robust security controls, increasing their exposure. The absence of patches further elevates the risk until mitigations are applied.

Summary

CVE-2025-14990 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System version 1.0. The vulnerability resides in the /admin/view-appointment.php script, where the 'viewid' parameter is improperly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL queries. This injection flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it highly accessible to attackers. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized data disclosure, modification, or deletion within the backend database, potentially compromising sensitive customer and appointment information. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9 (medium severity), reflecting the network attack vector, low attack complexity, and no privileges or user interaction needed, but with limited scope and impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no active exploits have been reported in the wild, the public availability of exploit code increases the likelihood of exploitation attempts. The vulnerability affects only version 1.0 of the product, and no official patches have been published yet. The flaw is critical for organizations relying on this software for managing appointments and customer data, as it could lead to data breaches or service disruptions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 23:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats