CVE-2025-15082VulnerabilityPublished 25 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-15082: TOZED ZLT M30s · Information Disclosure

Affects TOZED ZLT M30sSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 52% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TOZED ZLT M30s	Affected =1.0 =1.1 =1.2 =1.3 =1.4 =1.5 =1.6 =1.7 =1.8 =1.9 =1.10 =1.11 =1.12 =1.13 =1.14 =1.15 =1.16 =1.17 =1.18 =1.19 =1.20 =1.21 =1.22 =1.23 =1.24 =1.25 =1.26 =1.27 =1.28 =1.29 =1.30 =1.31 =1.32 =1.33 =1.34 =1.35 =1.36 =1.37 =1.38 =1.39 =1.40 =1.41 =1.42 =1.43 =1.44 =1.45 =1.46 =1.47	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of vendor patches, European organizations should implement compensating controls to mitigate the risk from CVE-2025-15082. First, restrict network access to the Web Management Interface of TOZED ZLT M30s devices by implementing strict firewall rules and access control lists (ACLs), allowing only trusted management hosts to connect. Deploy network segmentation to isolate these devices from general user networks and the internet. Enable and monitor logging on these devices and network infrastructure to detect anomalous requests targeting the 'goformId' parameter or unusual HTTP POST activity. Use intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with custom signatures to identify exploitation attempts. Consider deploying web application firewalls (WAF) in front of management interfaces to filter malicious input. If possible, disable the Web Management Interface or restrict it to out-of-band management networks. Conduct regular vulnerability scans and penetration tests focusing on these devices to identify exploitation attempts. Finally, maintain an inventory of affected devices and prepare for rapid patch deployment once the vendor releases a fix or consider alternative devices with better security support if feasible.

Description

CVE-2025-15082 is a medium severity information disclosure vulnerability affecting TOZED ZLT M30s devices up to version 1.47. The flaw exists in the Web Management Interface, specifically in the /reqproc/proc_post file, where manipulation of the goformId argument can leak sensitive information. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication or user interaction, and an exploit has been publicly disclosed. Although the vendor was notified, no patch or response has been provided. This vulnerability could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to information that may aid further attacks or compromise device confidentiality. European organizations using these devices in their network infrastructure could be at risk, especially in critical sectors relying on these devices. Mitigation requires network-level protections and monitoring due to the lack of vendor patches. Countries with higher adoption of TOZED ZLT M30s or strategic infrastructure using these devices are more likely to be impacted.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-15082 can be significant, especially for those deploying TOZED ZLT M30s devices in network management or security-critical roles. Information disclosure could reveal sensitive configuration details, credentials, or internal network topology, enabling attackers to plan more sophisticated intrusions or escalate privileges. This is particularly concerning for sectors such as telecommunications, energy, finance, and government, where network devices are integral to operational continuity and data protection. The lack of vendor response and patches increases exposure time, raising the risk of exploitation. Additionally, since the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, attackers can target these devices directly from the internet or internal networks if adequate segmentation is not enforced. This could lead to breaches of confidentiality, potential regulatory non-compliance under GDPR if personal data is indirectly exposed, and reputational damage. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability does not directly impact device integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach alone can have cascading effects on organizational security.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 1 Jan 2026, 22:37 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats