CVE-2025-15176VulnerabilityPublished 29 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-15176: Open5GS · Reachable Assertion

Affects Open5GSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 49% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubopen5gs/open5gs`pkg:github/open5gs/open5gs`Other threats	Affected =2.7.0 =2.7.1 =2.7.2 =2.7.3 =2.7.4 =2.7.5	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-15176, organizations should immediately apply the official patch identified by commit b72d8349980076e2c033c8324f07747a86eea4f8 to all affected Open5GS instances running versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.5. Network administrators should restrict access to PFCP ports (typically UDP 8805) using firewall rules to limit exposure to trusted network segments only. Implement network segmentation to isolate 5G core components from untrusted networks and monitor PFCP traffic for anomalies or malformed packets indicative of exploitation attempts. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or heuristics targeting malformed PFCP session establishment requests. Regularly update Open5GS to newer versions beyond 2.7.5 where this vulnerability is fixed. Additionally, conduct thorough testing in staging environments before deploying patches to production to avoid service disruptions. Maintain incident response plans to quickly address potential denial of service incidents affecting 5G core infrastructure.

Description

A flaw has been found in Open5GS up to 2.7.5. This affects the function decode_ipv6_header/ogs_pfcp_pdr_rule_find_by_packet of the file lib/pfcp/rule-match.c of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to reachable assertion. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called b72d8349980076e2c033c8324f07747a86eea4f8. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-15176 is denial of service against Open5GS 5G core network components handling PFCP session establishment. Successful exploitation can cause the PFCP handler to crash, disrupting the control plane communications between the control and user plane functions in the 5G core. This disruption can lead to dropped sessions, degraded network performance, and potential outages for mobile subscribers relying on affected infrastructure. Given the critical role of Open5GS in 5G core networks, such outages can affect telecommunication service providers, enterprises deploying private 5G networks, and research institutions. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity but can degrade availability, impacting end-user connectivity and service reliability. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the risk, especially in environments where Open5GS is exposed to untrusted networks. The availability of a public exploit further raises the likelihood of attacks, potentially leading to targeted denial of service campaigns against vulnerable 5G networks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:35 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats