VulnerabilityPublished 1 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-20367: Splunk Enterprise · The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

Affects Splunk EnterpriseSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.7 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.7Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Splunk Splunk Enterprise	Affected 9.2 – 10.0 4 affected builds	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate upgrade to the latest patched versions of Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Cloud Platform (at least 9.4.4, 9.3.6, or 9.2.8 and corresponding cloud versions) to ensure the vulnerability is remediated.
Implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) to minimize the number of users with permissions to access or manipulate the `/app/search/table` endpoint and the `dataset.command` parameter.
Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious payloads targeting the vulnerable parameter.
Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on web interface inputs to identify and remediate similar injection points.
Educate users to be cautious about clicking on links or viewing content within Splunk dashboards that could be crafted by untrusted users.
Monitor Splunk logs for unusual activities related to the vulnerable endpoint and parameter to detect potential exploitation attempts early.
If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting access to the affected endpoint or applying input validation proxies as a temporary mitigation.

Description

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.4, 9.3.6 and 9.2.8, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.109, 9.3.2408.119 and 9.2.2406.122, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' Splunk roles could craft a malicious payload through the `dataset.command` parameter of the `/app/search/table` endpoint, which could result in execution of unauthorized JavaScript code in the browser of a user.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality of sensitive security and operational data managed within Splunk environments. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute malicious scripts in the context of legitimate users, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, or lateral movement within the network. Given that Splunk is often used to monitor critical infrastructure, financial systems, and personal data processing, exploitation could result in data breaches subject to GDPR regulations, leading to legal and financial repercussions. The medium severity score indicates that while the vulnerability is not trivially exploitable without user interaction, the potential for damage is non-negligible, especially in environments with multiple users accessing Splunk dashboards. Additionally, the presence of low-privileged users capable of crafting malicious payloads increases the attack surface. European organizations with multi-tenant or shared Splunk deployments are particularly at risk, as attackers could leverage this vulnerability to target other users within the same environment.

References

advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2025-1002 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 1 Oct 2025, 16:18 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats