CVE-2025-2135VulnerabilityPublished 10 Mar 2025Updated 26 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-2135: Google Chrome · Type Confusion

Affects Google ChromeSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High : upgrade to 134.0.6998.88 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.8High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 6.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 93% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 134.0.6998.88

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Mar 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Google Chrome to 134.0.6998.88.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Google Chrome	Affected =134.0.6998.88 <134.0.6998.88	Fixed in 134.0.6998.88

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-2135, organizations should immediately update all instances of Google Chrome to version 134.0.6998.88 or later, which contains the official patch. Beyond patching, organizations should implement strict web content filtering to block access to untrusted or malicious websites, reducing the chance of user interaction with crafted HTML pages. Employ browser security features such as sandboxing, site isolation, and strict content security policies to limit the impact of potential exploits. Use endpoint protection solutions with behavioral detection to identify exploitation attempts. Educate users about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting suspicious sites to reduce the likelihood of triggering the vulnerability. Network-level protections like web proxies and intrusion prevention systems can help detect and block exploit attempts. Regularly monitor threat intelligence feeds for emerging exploit code or campaigns targeting this vulnerability. Finally, consider deploying browser isolation technologies for high-risk users to contain potential attacks.

Description

Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 134.0.6998.88 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Impact

The potential impact of CVE-2025-2135 is substantial for organizations worldwide. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution within the browser context, allowing attackers to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, install malware, or pivot to internal networks. Confidentiality is at risk due to possible data exfiltration, integrity can be compromised through code or data manipulation, and availability may be affected if the exploit causes crashes or denial of service. Since Chrome is widely deployed across enterprises, governments, and individuals, the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks or widespread campaigns. The requirement for user interaction limits automated exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where users frequently browse untrusted sites or receive phishing links. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk but does not preclude future weaponization. Organizations with high-value targets, such as financial institutions, critical infrastructure, and government agencies, face elevated risk due to the potential for sophisticated attackers to exploit this flaw.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Feb 2026, 19:59 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats