CVE-2025-21486: Qualcomm Snapdragon · Untrusted Pointer Dereference
Affects Qualcomm SnapdragonSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.09% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2025-21486, organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Monitor Qualcomm’s security advisories closely and apply firmware and software patches promptly once released to address this vulnerability. 2) Restrict local access to devices running affected Snapdragon platforms by enforcing strong physical security controls and limiting user privileges to the minimum necessary. 3) Employ application whitelisting and sandboxing to prevent unauthorized execution of untrusted binaries that could exploit the dynamic process creation flaw. 4) Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to monitor for anomalous process creation activities or memory corruption indicators on affected devices. 5) For IoT and embedded systems, ensure secure boot and firmware integrity verification to reduce the risk of persistent compromise. 6) Network segmentation can limit the spread of an exploit if a device is compromised. 7) Educate users and administrators about the risks of local exploitation and the importance of device security hygiene. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on controlling local access, monitoring process creation, and preparing for patch deployment.
Description
Memory corruption during dynamic process creation call when client is only passing address and length of shell binary.