CVE-2025-31995: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in HCL Software MaxAI Workbench
HCL Unica MaxAI Workbench is vulnerable to improper input validation. This allows attackers to exploit vulnerabilities such as SQL Injection, XSS, or command injection, leading to unauthorized access or data breaches, etc.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-31995 identifies a vulnerability in HCL Software's MaxAI Workbench, specifically caused by improper input validation (CWE-20). This vulnerability affects versions 12.1.10 through 25.1 of the product. Improper input validation means that the software does not adequately verify or sanitize user-supplied input before processing it, which can lead to injection attacks such as SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), or command injection. These injection attacks can allow an attacker to manipulate backend databases, execute arbitrary commands, or inject malicious scripts, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data breaches, or data integrity issues. The CVSS v3.1 score is 3.5, indicating a low severity level, with the vector showing that the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), requires privileges (PR:L), and user interaction (UI:R). The scope is unchanged (S:U), and the impact affects integrity slightly (I:L) but not confidentiality or availability. No patches or known exploits are currently available, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of inputs, which is a common root cause for injection flaws. Organizations using MaxAI Workbench should be aware of this risk and prepare to apply patches or mitigations once released.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on the deployment scale of HCL MaxAI Workbench and the sensitivity of the data processed. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of data or execution of unauthorized commands, potentially compromising data integrity and trustworthiness of analytics or AI-driven decisions. While confidentiality and availability impacts are not indicated, integrity breaches can have cascading effects in business processes, regulatory compliance, and decision-making. Given the requirement for user interaction and privileges, the risk is somewhat mitigated but still relevant in environments where insider threats or phishing attacks are possible. Industries relying on MaxAI Workbench for critical AI workloads, such as finance, manufacturing, or government agencies, could face operational disruptions or reputational damage if exploited. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but proactive mitigation is advised.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor HCL Software communications closely for official patches addressing CVE-2025-31995 and apply them promptly upon release. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization controls at the application and network layers to detect and block injection attempts. 3. Enforce the principle of least privilege for all users interacting with MaxAI Workbench to limit the potential impact of exploitation. 4. Educate users about phishing and social engineering risks to reduce the likelihood of successful user interaction-based attacks. 5. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures tuned to detect injection patterns relevant to MaxAI Workbench. 6. Conduct regular security assessments and code reviews focusing on input handling in custom integrations or extensions of MaxAI Workbench. 7. Maintain robust logging and monitoring to detect anomalous activities indicative of exploitation attempts. 8. Segment networks to isolate critical AI workloads and restrict access to trusted users and systems only.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden
CVE-2025-31995: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in HCL Software MaxAI Workbench
Description
HCL Unica MaxAI Workbench is vulnerable to improper input validation. This allows attackers to exploit vulnerabilities such as SQL Injection, XSS, or command injection, leading to unauthorized access or data breaches, etc.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-31995 identifies a vulnerability in HCL Software's MaxAI Workbench, specifically caused by improper input validation (CWE-20). This vulnerability affects versions 12.1.10 through 25.1 of the product. Improper input validation means that the software does not adequately verify or sanitize user-supplied input before processing it, which can lead to injection attacks such as SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), or command injection. These injection attacks can allow an attacker to manipulate backend databases, execute arbitrary commands, or inject malicious scripts, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data breaches, or data integrity issues. The CVSS v3.1 score is 3.5, indicating a low severity level, with the vector showing that the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), requires privileges (PR:L), and user interaction (UI:R). The scope is unchanged (S:U), and the impact affects integrity slightly (I:L) but not confidentiality or availability. No patches or known exploits are currently available, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of inputs, which is a common root cause for injection flaws. Organizations using MaxAI Workbench should be aware of this risk and prepare to apply patches or mitigations once released.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on the deployment scale of HCL MaxAI Workbench and the sensitivity of the data processed. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of data or execution of unauthorized commands, potentially compromising data integrity and trustworthiness of analytics or AI-driven decisions. While confidentiality and availability impacts are not indicated, integrity breaches can have cascading effects in business processes, regulatory compliance, and decision-making. Given the requirement for user interaction and privileges, the risk is somewhat mitigated but still relevant in environments where insider threats or phishing attacks are possible. Industries relying on MaxAI Workbench for critical AI workloads, such as finance, manufacturing, or government agencies, could face operational disruptions or reputational damage if exploited. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but proactive mitigation is advised.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor HCL Software communications closely for official patches addressing CVE-2025-31995 and apply them promptly upon release. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization controls at the application and network layers to detect and block injection attempts. 3. Enforce the principle of least privilege for all users interacting with MaxAI Workbench to limit the potential impact of exploitation. 4. Educate users about phishing and social engineering risks to reduce the likelihood of successful user interaction-based attacks. 5. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures tuned to detect injection patterns relevant to MaxAI Workbench. 6. Conduct regular security assessments and code reviews focusing on input handling in custom integrations or extensions of MaxAI Workbench. 7. Maintain robust logging and monitoring to detect anomalous activities indicative of exploitation attempts. 8. Segment networks to isolate critical AI workloads and restrict access to trusted users and systems only.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- HCL
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-01T18:46:35.961Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68ec89cf1590c630c202cbe3
Added to database: 10/13/2025, 5:10:39 AM
Last enriched: 10/21/2025, 12:32:50 AM
Last updated: 12/3/2025, 4:05:15 AM
Views: 57
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-13495: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in wpmanageninja FluentCart A New Era of eCommerce – Faster, Lighter, and Simpler
MediumCVE-2025-12585: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in mxchat MxChat – AI Chatbot for WordPress
MediumCVE-2025-10304: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in everestthemes Everest Backup – WordPress Cloud Backup, Migration, Restore & Cloning Plugin
MediumCVE-2025-13646: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in wpchill Image Gallery – Photo Grid & Video Gallery
HighCVE-2025-13645: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in wpchill Image Gallery – Photo Grid & Video Gallery
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.