Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-34503: Light & Wonder, Inc. / SHFL Entertainment, Inc. / Shuffle Master Deck Mate 1 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Affects Light & Wonder, Inc. / SHFL Entertainment, Inc. / Shuffle Master Deck Mate 1Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.0 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
7.0High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 24 Oct 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Light & Wonder, Inc. / SHFL Entertainment, Inc. / Shuffle Master, Inc. Deck Mate 1Affected
  • =0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

No official patches or firmware updates are available from the vendor for this legacy model. Because the vulnerability requires physical access, the primary mitigation is to ensure strong physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to the device. Alternatively, affected devices should be retired from service to eliminate risk. There are no software-based mitigations due to the device's design limitations.

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…