VulnerabilityPublished 19 Jun 2025Updated 26 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-36050: IBM QRadar SIEM · Sensitive Data in Logs

Affects IBM QRadar SIEMSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.2 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.2Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 5% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBM QRadar SIEM	Affected =7.5	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately review and restrict local access permissions to QRadar SIEM servers, ensuring that only trusted and necessary personnel have such access. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on log files to detect unauthorized access attempts. Until IBM releases an official patch, organizations can consider implementing log file encryption or relocating logs to secure storage with limited access. Regularly audit log contents for sensitive information and sanitize logs where feasible to remove or mask sensitive data. Employ host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor unusual file access patterns. Additionally, organizations should follow IBM's security advisories closely for patch releases and apply updates promptly. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for local access and using role-based access control (RBAC) can further reduce the risk of exploitation. Finally, conduct internal awareness training to highlight the risks of local access to sensitive logs and enforce policies to minimize unnecessary local log file exposure.

Description

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 through 7.5.0 Update Package 12 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant confidentiality risk. QRadar SIEM is commonly deployed in enterprise environments for security monitoring and incident response. If sensitive information such as credentials, tokens, or internal system details are logged and accessible to local users, it could lead to insider threats or privilege escalation by malicious insiders or compromised local accounts. This exposure could facilitate lateral movement within networks or data exfiltration. Given the GDPR and other stringent data protection regulations in Europe, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data could result in regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and loss of customer trust. The impact is particularly critical in sectors with high security requirements such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure, where QRadar SIEM is often used. Although the vulnerability requires local access, many organizations have multiple administrators or support personnel with local system access, increasing the risk surface. The absence of integrity or availability impact means the threat is primarily data confidentiality leakage rather than system disruption.

CWE-532Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumOWASP Top 10 A09:2025: Security Logging & Alerting Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product writes sensitive information to a log file.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Consider seriously the sensitivity of the information written into log files. Do not write secrets into the log files.
Distribution
Remove debug log files before deploying the application into production.
Operation
Protect log files against unauthorized read/write.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Application Logging Vocabulary (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V7.1.1 (opens in a new tab)
V7.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Fuzzing for application mapping (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

ibm.com/support/pages/node/7237317 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Aug 2025, 00:47 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-532

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats