CVE-2025-36116VulnerabilityPublished 23 Jul 2025Updated 18 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-36116: IBM Db2 Mirror for i · Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets

Affects IBM Db2 Mirror for iSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 7% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBM Db2 Mirror for i	Affected =7.4 =7.5 =7.6	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately review network segmentation and access controls to restrict access to the Db2 Mirror for i GUI to trusted users and networks only. Implement strict firewall rules to limit WebSocket traffic to authorized sources. Monitor WebSocket connections for unusual activity or unauthorized access attempts. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with WebSocket inspection capabilities to detect and block suspicious WebSocket hijacking attempts. Additionally, enforce multi-factor authentication and strong session management on the GUI to reduce the risk of session hijacking. Regularly audit and log all operations performed via the Db2 Mirror GUI to detect anomalies. Finally, educate users about the risks of accessing the GUI from untrusted networks or devices.

Description

IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 GUI is affected by cross-site WebSocket hijacking vulnerability. By sending a specially crafted request, an unauthenticated malicious actor could exploit this vulnerability to sniff an existing WebSocket connection to then remotely perform operations that the user is not allowed to perform.

Impact

For European organizations using IBM Db2 Mirror for i, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and manipulation of database mirror operations via the GUI. Since Db2 Mirror for i is used for high availability and disaster recovery in enterprise environments, exploitation could disrupt data replication processes, potentially causing data inconsistency or downtime. Confidentiality risks include exposure of sensitive data transmitted over WebSocket connections. Integrity risks involve unauthorized commands altering database mirror states or configurations. Availability could be impacted if attackers disrupt mirroring, leading to service interruptions. Given the medium severity and the requirement for network access and low privileges, attackers inside the network or with access to the GUI interface could exploit this. European organizations with critical infrastructure or financial data relying on Db2 Mirror for i could face operational risks and compliance issues under GDPR if data confidentiality is compromised.

CWE-1385Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets (opens in a new tab)
Variant weakness
The product uses a WebSocket, but it does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
Implementation
Enable CORS-like access restrictions by verifying the 'Origin' header during the WebSocket handshake.
Implementation
Use a randomized CSRF token to verify requests.
Implementation
Use TLS to securely communicate using 'wss' (WebSocket Secure) instead of 'ws'.
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.5.2 (opens in a new tab)
V14.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

ibm.com/support/pages/node/7240351 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Aug 2025, 01:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1385

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats