CVE-2025-36529VulnerabilityPublished 27 Jun 2025Updated 30 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-36529: TB-eye XRN-410SN/TE · OS Command Injection

Affects TB-eye XRN-410SN/TESource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.2 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.2High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 66% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TB-eye Ltd. XRN-410SN/TE	Affected <=2.47	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately audit their inventory to identify any TB-eye XRN-410SN/TE devices running vulnerable firmware versions (Ver2.47b_220119153805 or earlier). Until official patches are released, implement strict access controls including network segmentation to isolate these devices from general IT networks and restrict management interfaces to trusted administrators only. Enforce strong authentication policies, replacing default or weak passwords with complex, unique credentials and consider multi-factor authentication if supported. Monitor device logs and network traffic for unusual command execution patterns or unauthorized access attempts. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems tailored to detect anomalies in device behavior. Where possible, disable unnecessary services or remote management features to reduce attack vectors. Maintain close communication with TB-eye Ltd. for firmware updates and apply patches promptly once available. Additionally, conduct regular security awareness training for personnel managing these devices to recognize and respond to potential compromise indicators.

Description

An OS command injection issue exists in multiple versions of TB-eye network recorders and AHD recorders. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by an attacker who is logging in to the device.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a serious threat, particularly to sectors relying on TB-eye's network and AHD recorders for security surveillance, such as transportation hubs, manufacturing plants, utilities, and public safety agencies. Exploitation could allow attackers to gain control over these devices, potentially leading to unauthorized access to video feeds, disruption of surveillance operations, or pivoting into broader network environments. This could compromise physical security, violate privacy regulations such as GDPR due to unauthorized data access, and disrupt critical services. Given the high integrity and availability impact, attackers might manipulate recorded footage or disable recording capabilities, undermining incident response and forensic investigations. The requirement for authenticated access limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially if credential management is weak or default credentials are in use. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window for proactive defense, but organizations should not delay remediation efforts.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Jun 2025, 19:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats