CVE-2025-37858: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 << l2agsize in dbExtendFS(). When l2agsize exceeds 31 (possible with >2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-37858 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's JFS (Journaled File System) implementation affecting 32-bit architectures. The issue arises from an integer overflow during the calculation of the allocation group (AG) size in the function dbExtendFS(). Specifically, the calculation uses a left bit-shift operation (1 << l2agsize) where l2agsize can exceed 31 when dealing with aggregates larger than 2TB on 32-bit systems. Since shifting a 32-bit integer by 32 or more bits results in undefined behavior (commonly zero), this causes the AG size to be incorrectly computed as zero or an invalid value. The AG size is stored in sbi->bmap->db_agsize, which is a 64-bit signed integer (s64), but the calculation was performed using 32-bit arithmetic without proper casting. This leads to invalid AG sizes, which in turn cause subsequent block allocations to reference invalid AG structures. The consequences include potential filesystem corruption during extend operations, kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses, and possible security vulnerabilities through malformed on-disk structures. The fix involves casting the value to s64 before shifting to ensure 64-bit arithmetic is used, matching the data type of db_agsize and preventing overflow. This vulnerability was discovered by the Linux Verification Center using static analysis tools. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date. The vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and likely earlier versions containing the flawed code. Since this issue specifically impacts 32-bit Linux systems using JFS with large filesystems (>2TB), it is a niche but critical flaw for affected environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-37858 depends on the prevalence of 32-bit Linux systems running the JFS filesystem with large storage aggregates. While 64-bit systems dominate modern deployments, some legacy or embedded systems in industrial, telecommunications, or specialized computing environments may still use 32-bit Linux kernels with JFS. In such cases, the vulnerability could lead to filesystem corruption, resulting in data loss or downtime. Kernel crashes caused by invalid memory accesses could disrupt critical services, impacting availability. Additionally, malformed on-disk structures might be leveraged by attackers with local access to escalate privileges or cause denial of service. Although no remote exploitation vector is indicated, insider threats or compromised local users could exploit this flaw. European sectors relying on legacy Linux systems for infrastructure, manufacturing, or research might face operational risks. Data integrity and availability are the primary concerns, with confidentiality impact being less direct but possible if attackers exploit the instability to gain elevated access. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but unpatched systems remain vulnerable to accidental or intentional triggering of the flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-37858, European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all Linux systems running 32-bit kernels with JFS filesystems, focusing on those managing large storage aggregates (>2TB). 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that include the fix casting the shift operand to s64, ensuring the use of updated kernel versions containing the corrected code. 3) Where possible, migrate from 32-bit to 64-bit Linux architectures to inherently avoid the 32-bit integer overflow limitation. 4) Consider migrating from JFS to more widely maintained and robust filesystems like ext4 or XFS, especially for large-scale storage, to reduce risk exposure. 5) Implement monitoring for filesystem errors, kernel crashes, and unusual block allocation failures that could indicate exploitation or triggering of this vulnerability. 6) Restrict local user access and enforce strict privilege separation to minimize the risk of local exploitation. 7) Regularly back up critical data and verify backup integrity to recover from potential filesystem corruption. 8) Engage with Linux distribution vendors and security mailing lists to stay informed about patches and advisories related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden, Finland, Belgium
CVE-2025-37858: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 << l2agsize in dbExtendFS(). When l2agsize exceeds 31 (possible with >2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-37858 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's JFS (Journaled File System) implementation affecting 32-bit architectures. The issue arises from an integer overflow during the calculation of the allocation group (AG) size in the function dbExtendFS(). Specifically, the calculation uses a left bit-shift operation (1 << l2agsize) where l2agsize can exceed 31 when dealing with aggregates larger than 2TB on 32-bit systems. Since shifting a 32-bit integer by 32 or more bits results in undefined behavior (commonly zero), this causes the AG size to be incorrectly computed as zero or an invalid value. The AG size is stored in sbi->bmap->db_agsize, which is a 64-bit signed integer (s64), but the calculation was performed using 32-bit arithmetic without proper casting. This leads to invalid AG sizes, which in turn cause subsequent block allocations to reference invalid AG structures. The consequences include potential filesystem corruption during extend operations, kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses, and possible security vulnerabilities through malformed on-disk structures. The fix involves casting the value to s64 before shifting to ensure 64-bit arithmetic is used, matching the data type of db_agsize and preventing overflow. This vulnerability was discovered by the Linux Verification Center using static analysis tools. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date. The vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and likely earlier versions containing the flawed code. Since this issue specifically impacts 32-bit Linux systems using JFS with large filesystems (>2TB), it is a niche but critical flaw for affected environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-37858 depends on the prevalence of 32-bit Linux systems running the JFS filesystem with large storage aggregates. While 64-bit systems dominate modern deployments, some legacy or embedded systems in industrial, telecommunications, or specialized computing environments may still use 32-bit Linux kernels with JFS. In such cases, the vulnerability could lead to filesystem corruption, resulting in data loss or downtime. Kernel crashes caused by invalid memory accesses could disrupt critical services, impacting availability. Additionally, malformed on-disk structures might be leveraged by attackers with local access to escalate privileges or cause denial of service. Although no remote exploitation vector is indicated, insider threats or compromised local users could exploit this flaw. European sectors relying on legacy Linux systems for infrastructure, manufacturing, or research might face operational risks. Data integrity and availability are the primary concerns, with confidentiality impact being less direct but possible if attackers exploit the instability to gain elevated access. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but unpatched systems remain vulnerable to accidental or intentional triggering of the flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-37858, European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all Linux systems running 32-bit kernels with JFS filesystems, focusing on those managing large storage aggregates (>2TB). 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that include the fix casting the shift operand to s64, ensuring the use of updated kernel versions containing the corrected code. 3) Where possible, migrate from 32-bit to 64-bit Linux architectures to inherently avoid the 32-bit integer overflow limitation. 4) Consider migrating from JFS to more widely maintained and robust filesystems like ext4 or XFS, especially for large-scale storage, to reduce risk exposure. 5) Implement monitoring for filesystem errors, kernel crashes, and unusual block allocation failures that could indicate exploitation or triggering of this vulnerability. 6) Restrict local user access and enforce strict privilege separation to minimize the risk of local exploitation. 7) Regularly back up critical data and verify backup integrity to recover from potential filesystem corruption. 8) Engage with Linux distribution vendors and security mailing lists to stay informed about patches and advisories related to this vulnerability.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-16T04:51:23.957Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9818c4522896dcbd7ce7
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:40 AM
Last enriched: 7/4/2025, 12:28:32 AM
Last updated: 7/29/2025, 12:52:16 PM
Views: 12
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9023: Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC7
HighCVE-2025-8905: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in inpersttion Inpersttion For Theme
MediumCVE-2025-8720: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in morehawes Plugin README Parser
MediumCVE-2025-8091: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in ashanjay EventON – Events Calendar
MediumCVE-2025-8080: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in alobaidi Alobaidi Captcha
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.