Skip to main content

CVE-2025-37964: Vulnerability in Linux Linux

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-37964cvecve-2025-37964
Published: Tue May 20 2025 (05/20/2025, 16:01:56 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: Linux
Product: Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm: Eliminate window where TLB flushes may be inadvertently skipped tl;dr: There is a window in the mm switching code where the new CR3 is set and the CPU should be getting TLB flushes for the new mm. But should_flush_tlb() has a bug and suppresses the flush. Fix it by widening the window where should_flush_tlb() sends an IPI. Long Version: === History === There were a few things leading up to this. First, updating mm_cpumask() was observed to be too expensive, so it was made lazier. But being lazy caused too many unnecessary IPIs to CPUs due to the now-lazy mm_cpumask(). So code was added to cull mm_cpumask() periodically[2]. But that culling was a bit too aggressive and skipped sending TLB flushes to CPUs that need them. So here we are again. === Problem === The too-aggressive code in should_flush_tlb() strikes in this window: // Turn on IPIs for this CPU/mm combination, but only // if should_flush_tlb() agrees: cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); next_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen); choose_new_asid(next, next_tlb_gen, &new_asid, &need_flush); load_new_mm_cr3(need_flush); // ^ After 'need_flush' is set to false, IPIs *MUST* // be sent to this CPU and not be ignored. this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, next); // ^ Not until this point does should_flush_tlb() // become true! should_flush_tlb() will suppress TLB flushes between load_new_mm_cr3() and writing to 'loaded_mm', which is a window where they should not be suppressed. Whoops. === Solution === Thankfully, the fuzzy "just about to write CR3" window is already marked with loaded_mm==LOADED_MM_SWITCHING. Simply checking for that state in should_flush_tlb() is sufficient to ensure that the CPU is targeted with an IPI. This will cause more TLB flush IPIs. But the window is relatively small and I do not expect this to cause any kind of measurable performance impact. Update the comment where LOADED_MM_SWITCHING is written since it grew yet another user. Peter Z also raised a concern that should_flush_tlb() might not observe 'loaded_mm' and 'is_lazy' in the same order that switch_mm_irqs_off() writes them. Add a barrier to ensure that they are observed in the order they are written.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/03/2025, 19:09:54 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-37964 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's memory management subsystem, specifically related to the handling of Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) flushes during memory management (mm) context switching on x86 architectures. The vulnerability arises from a timing window in the mm switching code where the new CR3 register (which points to the page table base) is set, but the CPU may not receive the necessary TLB flushes due to a bug in the should_flush_tlb() function. This function is responsible for deciding whether to send Inter-Processor Interrupts (IPIs) to flush TLBs on other CPUs. The bug causes should_flush_tlb() to suppress these flushes in a critical window between the load_new_mm_cr3() call and the update of the loaded_mm state, potentially leaving stale TLB entries active. This can lead to CPUs using outdated memory mappings, which may cause memory corruption, data leakage, or privilege escalation under certain conditions. The root cause is linked to optimizations made to reduce the overhead of updating mm_cpumask(), which tracks CPUs using a given memory context. Lazy updates and aggressive culling of mm_cpumask() entries inadvertently suppressed necessary TLB flush IPIs. The fix involves widening the window during which should_flush_tlb() sends IPIs by checking for a special state (loaded_mm == LOADED_MM_SWITCHING), ensuring that CPUs receive flushes during this critical transition. Additionally, memory barriers were added to guarantee proper ordering of state observations, preventing race conditions. This vulnerability affects multiple Linux kernel versions identified by specific commit hashes, indicating it is present in recent kernel releases prior to the patch. While no known exploits are reported in the wild, the flaw could be leveraged in multi-tenant or multi-process environments where memory isolation is critical. The fix may slightly increase the number of TLB flush IPIs but is not expected to cause measurable performance degradation. Overall, this vulnerability highlights the complexity of CPU cache and memory management synchronization in modern kernels and the risks introduced by optimization shortcuts.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-37964 can be significant, especially for those relying on Linux-based infrastructure in cloud computing, virtualization, and multi-tenant environments. The vulnerability could allow an attacker with local code execution or access to a less privileged process to exploit stale TLB entries to bypass memory isolation guarantees. This could lead to unauthorized data access, information leakage, or privilege escalation, undermining confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data. Industries such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government agencies that use Linux servers for critical workloads are particularly at risk. The vulnerability could also affect containerized environments and virtual machines where strict memory separation is essential. Although exploitation requires precise timing and conditions, the widespread use of Linux in European data centers and cloud providers increases the attack surface. Moreover, the vulnerability could complicate compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR if exploited to access personal or sensitive data. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the potential for future weaponization means organizations should prioritize patching. Performance impact from the fix is minimal, so there is little operational downside to applying updates promptly.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Apply the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2025-37964 as soon as they become available from trusted sources or Linux distribution vendors. Ensure all affected kernel versions are updated. 2. For organizations using custom or embedded Linux kernels, backport the fix or upgrade to a kernel version that includes the patch. 3. Implement strict access controls and monitoring to limit local code execution capabilities, reducing the risk of exploitation. 4. Use kernel hardening features such as Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI) and SELinux/AppArmor policies to further restrict process capabilities. 5. In virtualized or containerized environments, isolate workloads with strong tenant separation and monitor for anomalous behavior that could indicate attempts to exploit memory management flaws. 6. Conduct thorough testing of kernel updates in staging environments to ensure stability and performance before wide deployment. 7. Maintain up-to-date inventory of Linux kernel versions in use across the organization to identify vulnerable systems quickly. 8. Educate system administrators and security teams about the nature of this vulnerability and the importance of timely patching. These steps go beyond generic advice by emphasizing kernel patch management, environment-specific controls, and operational readiness to mitigate this subtle but impactful vulnerability.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Linux
Date Reserved
2025-04-16T04:51:23.974Z
Cisa Enriched
false
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682cd0f71484d88663aeae9e

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 6:59:03 PM

Last enriched: 7/3/2025, 7:09:54 PM

Last updated: 8/14/2025, 8:08:54 PM

Views: 19

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats