CVE-2025-41031VulnerabilityPublished 2 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-41031: T-INNOVA Deporsite · Incorrect Authorization

Affects T-INNOVA DeporsiteSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to 02.14.1115 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 02.14.1115

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade T-INNOVA Deporsite to 02.14.1115.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
T-INNOVA Deporsite	Affected <02.14.1115	Fixed in 02.14.1115

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-41031, European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Immediately identify and inventory all instances of Deporsite running versions prior to v02.14.1115. 2) Monitor vendor communications closely for official patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 3) In the interim, implement network-level access controls to restrict access to the vulnerable endpoint '/ajax/TInnova_c/FotoUsuario/llamadaAjax/uploadImage' only to authenticated and authorized users, possibly via web application firewalls (WAFs) or reverse proxies with strict rules. 4) Conduct thorough access control reviews and penetration testing on Deporsite installations to detect similar authorization weaknesses. 5) Educate users and administrators about the risk of profile image tampering and encourage reporting of suspicious profile changes. 6) Implement anomaly detection mechanisms to flag unusual profile picture changes, especially those originating from unauthenticated sources or unexpected IP addresses. 7) If feasible, temporarily disable the profile picture upload feature until a patch is applied. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on access restriction, monitoring, and user awareness specific to this vulnerability's exploitation vector.

Description

Lack of authorisation in Deporsite by T-INNOVA. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to change other users' profile pictures via a POST request using the parameters ‘IdPersona’ and “Foto” in ‘/ajax/TInnova_c/FotoUsuario/llamadaAjax/uploadImage’.

Impact

For European organizations using T-INNOVA's Deporsite platform, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized modification of user profile pictures, which may have several consequences. Firstly, it could facilitate social engineering attacks by allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users visually, potentially tricking other users or employees into divulging sensitive information or performing unauthorized actions. Secondly, it could damage the reputation of organizations relying on Deporsite for user identity management or community engagement, as users may lose trust in the platform's security. While the vulnerability does not directly expose sensitive data or disrupt service availability, the integrity compromise of user profiles can have cascading effects on organizational security posture and user confidence. Given that no authentication is required, the attack surface is broad, and any external attacker can exploit this remotely. European organizations in sectors where user identity and trust are critical, such as financial services, education, or public administration, may face higher risks. Additionally, regulatory compliance frameworks like GDPR emphasize protecting personal data integrity, so exploitation could lead to compliance issues or reputational harm.

CWE-863Incorrect Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #17OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-deporsite-t-innova (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 2 Sep 2025, 08:47 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-863

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats