Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-4337: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in mitchelllevy AHAthat Plugin

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-4337cvecve-2025-4337cwe-352
Published: Tue May 06 2025 (05/06/2025, 04:24:12 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: mitchelllevy
Product: AHAthat Plugin

Description

The AHAthat Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the aha_plugin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete AHA pages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/27/2026, 14:26:36 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-4337 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the AHAthat Plugin for WordPress, developed by mitchelllevy. This vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.6. The root cause is the absence or improper implementation of nonce validation within the aha_plugin_page() function, which is responsible for handling certain plugin page actions. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and not from malicious third parties. Without proper nonce checks, attackers can craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (e.g., by clicking a specially crafted link), can trigger unauthorized actions such as deleting AHA pages. The attack vector requires no prior authentication by the attacker but does require user interaction from an administrator. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity level due to the limited impact on confidentiality and availability but a potential impact on integrity. The vulnerability does not currently have any publicly known exploits in the wild, and no patches or updates have been linked yet. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-352, which covers CSRF issues where state-changing requests can be forged without proper validation.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity of affected WordPress sites using the AHAthat Plugin. An attacker can cause unauthorized deletion of AHA pages, potentially leading to loss of important content or disruption of site functionality. While confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, the unauthorized modification of content can damage organizational reputation and trust. For organizations relying on this plugin for critical content management, this could result in operational disruptions and increased administrative overhead to restore lost data. Since exploitation requires an administrator to be tricked into clicking a malicious link, social engineering is a key component, increasing the risk in environments where administrators may be targeted by phishing campaigns. The vulnerability affects all sites running vulnerable versions of the plugin globally, with no authentication required for the attacker, increasing the attack surface. However, the need for user interaction and the medium CVSS score somewhat limit the immediacy of risk.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately verify whether they are using the AHAthat Plugin version 1.6 or earlier and plan to update to a patched version once available. In the absence of an official patch, administrators or site maintainers should implement manual nonce validation in the aha_plugin_page() function to ensure that all state-changing requests are protected against CSRF. Additionally, administrators should be trained to recognize and avoid phishing attempts and suspicious links, as exploitation depends on user interaction. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns can provide an additional layer of defense. Regular backups of site content should be maintained to quickly recover from any unauthorized deletions. Monitoring administrative actions and logs for unusual activity can help detect attempted exploitation early. Finally, limiting administrative access to trusted networks or using multi-factor authentication can reduce the risk of successful social engineering attacks.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-05-05T15:45:30.529Z
Cisa Enriched
true
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682d981cc4522896dcbda88b

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:44 AM

Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 2:26:36 PM

Last updated: 3/25/2026, 3:06:39 AM

Views: 55

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses