Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-4437: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-4437cvecve-2025-4437
Published: Wed Aug 20 2025 (08/20/2025, 12:19:18 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Red Hat
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4

Description

There's a vulnerability in the CRI-O application where when container is launched with securityContext.runAsUser specifying a non-existent user, CRI-O attempts to create the user, reading the container's entire /etc/passwd file into memory. If this file is excessively large, it can cause the a high memory consumption leading applications to be killed due to out-of-memory. As a result a denial-of-service can be achieved, possibly disrupting other pods and services running in the same host.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/20/2025, 21:47:33 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-4437 is a vulnerability found in the CRI-O container runtime component used by Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. The issue arises when a container is launched with the securityContext.runAsUser field specifying a user ID that does not exist within the container's user database. In response, CRI-O attempts to create this user by reading the container's entire /etc/passwd file into memory. If the /etc/passwd file is unusually large, this operation can cause excessive memory consumption on the host system. This high memory usage can lead to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions, causing the host's kernel or container runtime to kill processes, including critical applications and other pods running on the same host. The result is a denial-of-service (DoS) condition that affects availability but does not compromise confidentiality or integrity. Exploitation requires the ability to launch containers with specific security contexts, which implies some level of privilege or user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.7 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required privileges, and user interaction. No patches or exploits are currently publicly available, but the vulnerability poses a risk to environments running OpenShift Container Platform 4, especially those with large or manipulated /etc/passwd files inside containers. This vulnerability highlights the need for resource management and validation of container user configurations to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability can lead to denial-of-service conditions on hosts running Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. Since OpenShift is widely used for deploying containerized applications in enterprise and cloud environments, a successful exploitation could disrupt critical business services, internal applications, and multi-tenant workloads sharing the same infrastructure. The impact is primarily on availability, potentially causing downtime or degraded performance of containerized services. This could affect sectors relying heavily on container orchestration such as finance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and public services. Additionally, disruption of pods and services on a host could complicate incident response and recovery efforts. While confidentiality and integrity are not directly impacted, the operational disruption could indirectly affect compliance and service-level agreements. The medium severity score suggests that while the vulnerability is not trivial, it requires specific conditions and privileges to exploit, limiting the scope but still posing a notable risk in environments with insufficient resource controls or lax user configuration policies.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-4437, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Apply any available patches or updates from Red Hat for OpenShift Container Platform 4 and CRI-O as soon as they are released. 2) Enforce strict resource limits and quotas on containers and pods to prevent excessive memory consumption, including limits on memory usage and process counts. 3) Validate and restrict the use of securityContext.runAsUser in container specifications to prevent specifying non-existent users or untrusted user IDs. 4) Monitor /etc/passwd file sizes within container images and avoid using images with excessively large or manipulated passwd files. 5) Implement runtime monitoring and alerting for abnormal memory usage patterns on nodes running OpenShift workloads. 6) Use admission controllers or policy engines (e.g., Open Policy Agent) to enforce user and resource constraints at deployment time. 7) Educate developers and DevOps teams about the risks of specifying non-existent users in container security contexts. 8) Isolate critical workloads on dedicated nodes to reduce blast radius in case of resource exhaustion attacks. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific conditions that enable this vulnerability and controlling resource consumption proactively.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2025-05-08T15:35:44.324Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68a5c06fad5a09ad0004bfed

Added to database: 8/20/2025, 12:32:47 PM

Last enriched: 11/20/2025, 9:47:33 PM

Last updated: 11/21/2025, 3:34:40 AM

Views: 77

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats