CVE-2025-49492VulnerabilityPublished 1 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-49492: ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux · Out-of-bounds Write

Affects ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_LinuxSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.4 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.4High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 22% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately identify any deployments of ASR Falcon_Linux, Kestrel, or Lapwing_Linux systems, particularly those running versions prior to 1536. Network segmentation should be enforced to isolate vulnerable telephony components from broader enterprise networks, limiting potential attack vectors. Access controls must be tightened to restrict privileged access to these systems, including implementation of strong authentication and monitoring for anomalous activities. Since no official patches are currently available, organizations should engage with ASR for timelines on security updates and apply them promptly once released. In the interim, deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or heuristics targeting anomalous behavior in the atcmd_server component could help detect exploitation attempts. Regular memory integrity checks and system monitoring for crashes or unusual behavior in LTE telephony services are recommended. Furthermore, conducting penetration testing and vulnerability assessments focused on these components can help identify exposure and validate mitigation effectiveness. Finally, organizations should prepare incident response plans specific to telephony infrastructure compromise scenarios.

Description

Out-of-bounds write in ASR180x in lte-telephony, May cause a buffer underrun. This vulnerability is associated with program files apps/atcmd_server/src/dev_api.C. This issue affects Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux: before v1536.

Impact

For European organizations, especially telecommunications providers and infrastructure operators using ASR Falcon_Linux, Kestrel, or Lapwing_Linux systems, this vulnerability poses a significant risk. Exploitation could lead to service disruptions in LTE telephony networks, affecting availability and reliability of mobile communications. The integrity and confidentiality of telephony signaling or control data could also be compromised, potentially enabling further attacks or unauthorized access within critical network segments. Given the essential role of telecommunications in emergency services, business communications, and critical infrastructure, exploitation could have cascading effects on public safety and economic activities. Additionally, the requirement of privileges to exploit the vulnerability suggests insider threats or lateral movement by attackers who have gained limited access could escalate their control. The absence of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high severity score underscores the urgency for European organizations to assess and remediate affected systems promptly.

CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #5
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

asrmicro.com/en/goods/psirt?cid=40 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 1 Jul 2025, 11:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-787

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats