CVE-2025-49521: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
A flaw was found in the EDA component of the Ansible Automation Platform, where user-supplied Git branch or refspec values are evaluated as Jinja2 templates. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to inject expressions that execute commands or access sensitive files on the EDA worker. In OpenShift, it can lead to service account token theft.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-49521 is a high-severity vulnerability identified in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) component of the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the improper handling of user-supplied Git branch or refspec values, which are evaluated as Jinja2 templates without sufficient sanitization or validation. Jinja2 is a powerful templating engine that supports expression evaluation, and when user input is processed as a template, it can lead to code injection. In this case, authenticated users can craft malicious branch or refspec inputs that cause arbitrary command execution or unauthorized access to sensitive files on the EDA worker nodes. Furthermore, in environments where the Ansible Automation Platform is deployed on OpenShift, exploitation can extend to theft of service account tokens, which could allow attackers to escalate privileges or move laterally within the cluster. The vulnerability requires authentication but no user interaction beyond supplying the malicious input. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with a low attack complexity and network attack vector. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of the flaw and the widespread use of Ansible Automation Platform in enterprise environments make it a critical issue to address promptly. The lack of available patches at the time of publication underscores the urgency for organizations to implement interim mitigations and monitor for updates from Red Hat.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for those relying on Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for automating IT operations, configuration management, and orchestration. Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of the EDA worker nodes, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, access sensitive configuration files, and potentially disrupt automation workflows. In OpenShift deployments, the risk escalates as attackers could steal service account tokens, enabling privilege escalation and lateral movement within containerized environments. This can result in data breaches, operational downtime, and loss of trust. Given the critical role of automation platforms in managing infrastructure, the vulnerability could impact sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and government agencies across Europe, where compliance with strict data protection regulations like GDPR is mandatory. The potential for widespread disruption and data exposure makes this vulnerability particularly concerning for organizations with complex hybrid cloud and containerized environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting access to the Ansible Automation Platform to trusted and authenticated users only, minimizing the attack surface. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on Git branch and refspec inputs where possible, potentially by disabling or limiting the use of user-supplied templates until patches are available. 3. Monitor logs and audit trails for unusual or unauthorized template evaluations or command executions within the EDA component. 4. For OpenShift users, enforce strict RBAC policies to limit the scope and privileges of service accounts associated with Ansible Automation Platform components. 5. Network segmentation should be employed to isolate EDA workers from critical systems to contain potential breaches. 6. Stay informed on Red Hat advisories and apply official patches or updates as soon as they are released. 7. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block suspicious command executions. 8. Conduct a thorough review of automation workflows to identify and remediate any unsafe template usage patterns.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, Poland, Finland
CVE-2025-49521: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Description
A flaw was found in the EDA component of the Ansible Automation Platform, where user-supplied Git branch or refspec values are evaluated as Jinja2 templates. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to inject expressions that execute commands or access sensitive files on the EDA worker. In OpenShift, it can lead to service account token theft.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-49521 is a high-severity vulnerability identified in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) component of the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the improper handling of user-supplied Git branch or refspec values, which are evaluated as Jinja2 templates without sufficient sanitization or validation. Jinja2 is a powerful templating engine that supports expression evaluation, and when user input is processed as a template, it can lead to code injection. In this case, authenticated users can craft malicious branch or refspec inputs that cause arbitrary command execution or unauthorized access to sensitive files on the EDA worker nodes. Furthermore, in environments where the Ansible Automation Platform is deployed on OpenShift, exploitation can extend to theft of service account tokens, which could allow attackers to escalate privileges or move laterally within the cluster. The vulnerability requires authentication but no user interaction beyond supplying the malicious input. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with a low attack complexity and network attack vector. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of the flaw and the widespread use of Ansible Automation Platform in enterprise environments make it a critical issue to address promptly. The lack of available patches at the time of publication underscores the urgency for organizations to implement interim mitigations and monitor for updates from Red Hat.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for those relying on Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for automating IT operations, configuration management, and orchestration. Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of the EDA worker nodes, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, access sensitive configuration files, and potentially disrupt automation workflows. In OpenShift deployments, the risk escalates as attackers could steal service account tokens, enabling privilege escalation and lateral movement within containerized environments. This can result in data breaches, operational downtime, and loss of trust. Given the critical role of automation platforms in managing infrastructure, the vulnerability could impact sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and government agencies across Europe, where compliance with strict data protection regulations like GDPR is mandatory. The potential for widespread disruption and data exposure makes this vulnerability particularly concerning for organizations with complex hybrid cloud and containerized environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting access to the Ansible Automation Platform to trusted and authenticated users only, minimizing the attack surface. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on Git branch and refspec inputs where possible, potentially by disabling or limiting the use of user-supplied templates until patches are available. 3. Monitor logs and audit trails for unusual or unauthorized template evaluations or command executions within the EDA component. 4. For OpenShift users, enforce strict RBAC policies to limit the scope and privileges of service accounts associated with Ansible Automation Platform components. 5. Network segmentation should be employed to isolate EDA workers from critical systems to contain potential breaches. 6. Stay informed on Red Hat advisories and apply official patches or updates as soon as they are released. 7. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block suspicious command executions. 8. Conduct a thorough review of automation workflows to identify and remediate any unsafe template usage patterns.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2025-06-06T14:33:40.850Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6862f9826f40f0eb728cea63
Added to database: 6/30/2025, 8:54:26 PM
Last enriched: 9/26/2025, 12:27:05 AM
Last updated: 10/30/2025, 2:09:59 PM
Views: 70
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-10348: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Eveo URVE Smart Office
MediumCVE-2025-63608: n/a
HighRussian Hackers Exploit Adaptix Multi-Platform Pentesting Tool in Ransomware Attacks
HighCVE-2025-10317: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in OpenSolution Quick.Cart
MediumCVE-2025-39663: CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in Checkmk GmbH Checkmk
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.