CVE-2025-53486VulnerabilityPublished 7 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-53486: Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – WikiCategoryTagCloud extension · XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting'

Affects Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – WikiCategoryTagCloud extensionSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium · fixed in 1.44.0 : update Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – WikiCategoryTagCloud extension when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.44.0, 1.43.0, 1.40.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – WikiCategoryTagCloud extension to 1.44.0, 1.43.0 or 1.40.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - WikiCategoryTagCloud extension	Affected >=1.39.0 <1.40.0 >=1.42.0 <1.43.0 >=1.43.0 <1.44.0 =1.39.0 =1.40.0 =1.42.0 =1.43.0 =1.44.0	Fixed in 1.40.0 1.43.0 1.44.0

AI-suggested

European organizations should promptly upgrade the WikiCategoryTagCloud extension to the fixed versions: 1.39.13 or later for the 1.39.x branch, 1.42.7 or later for the 1.42.x branch, and 1.43.2 or later for the 1.43.x branch. If immediate patching is not possible, implement strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict inline script execution and limit the impact of injected scripts. Review and sanitize all user inputs that interact with the 'linkstyle' parameter or similar attributes, ensuring proper HTML escaping and validation beyond CSS sanitization. Conduct thorough code audits to verify that all dynamic HTML generation uses secure APIs like Html::element or Html::openElement to prevent injection flaws. Educate users about phishing risks to reduce the likelihood of successful social engineering attacks exploiting this reflected XSS. Monitor web server logs and user reports for suspicious activity or unexpected script execution. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting XSS payloads in URL parameters related to the tagcloud function. Finally, maintain an incident response plan to quickly address any exploitation attempts.

Description

The WikiCategoryTagCloud extension is vulnerable to reflected XSS via the linkstyle attribute, which is improperly concatenated into inline HTML without escaping. An attacker can inject JavaScript event handlers such as onmouseenter using carefully crafted input via the {{#tag:tagcloud}} parser function, resulting in arbitrary JavaScript execution when a victim hovers over a link in the category cloud. The vulnerability exists because the linkstyle parameter is only passed through Sanitizer::checkCss() (which does not escape HTML) and is then directly inserted into a style attribute using string concatenation instead of Html::element or Html::openElement. This issue affects Mediawiki - WikiCategoryTagCloud extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.

Impact

For European organizations using Mediawiki with the WikiCategoryTagCloud extension in the affected versions, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to web application security. Exploitation can lead to arbitrary JavaScript execution in users' browsers, compromising confidentiality by stealing session tokens or credentials, integrity by manipulating displayed content, and availability by potentially redirecting users or triggering denial-of-service conditions. Organizations that rely on Mediawiki for internal or public knowledge bases, documentation, or collaboration platforms may face reputational damage, data leakage, or unauthorized access if attackers leverage this XSS flaw. Given that Mediawiki is widely used by public institutions, educational entities, and enterprises across Europe, the vulnerability could be exploited to target sensitive information or disrupt services. The reflected nature of the XSS means that attackers need to trick users into clicking crafted URLs or interacting with malicious content, which is feasible through phishing or social engineering campaigns. The absence of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not preclude future attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability could be chained with other attacks to escalate privileges or move laterally within networks.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jul 2025, 15:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats