CVE-2025-54632VulnerabilityPublished 6 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-54632: Huawei HarmonyOS · Classic Buffer Overflow

Affects Huawei HarmonyOSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.8 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Physical
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Physical: The attack requires the attacker to physically touch or manipulate the vulnerable component. Physical interaction may be brief or persistent.
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Huawei HarmonyOS	Affected =5.1.0 =5.0.1 =4.3.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Physical Security: Enhance physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices running HarmonyOS, including secure storage, access control, and monitoring. 2. Device Inventory and Version Management: Maintain an accurate inventory of all Huawei devices and verify their operating system versions to identify those running affected HarmonyOS versions (4.3.1, 5.0.1, 5.1.0). 3. Patch Management: Monitor Huawei's official channels for patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-54632 and apply them promptly once available. 4. Network Segmentation: Isolate Huawei devices from critical network segments to limit potential lateral movement if a device is compromised. 5. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Deploy EDR solutions capable of detecting anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts on local devices. 6. User Awareness and Insider Threat Programs: Train staff on the risks of physical device compromise and implement insider threat detection mechanisms. 7. Disable Unnecessary Services: Where possible, disable or restrict access to the HVB module or related services to reduce the attack surface. 8. Device Hardening: Apply device hardening best practices specific to HarmonyOS, including disabling debug interfaces and enforcing strong authentication. 9. Incident Response Planning: Prepare incident response procedures for potential exploitation scenarios involving physical device compromise. These recommendations go beyond generic advice by focusing on the physical access requirement and the specific ecosystem of Huawei HarmonyOS devices.

Description

Vulnerability of insufficient data length verification in the HVB module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service integrity.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-54632 depends on the deployment of Huawei HarmonyOS devices within their infrastructure. Organizations using Huawei smartphones, tablets, or IoT devices running the affected versions may face risks of local exploitation leading to device compromise. The vulnerability could allow attackers with physical access to execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to data breaches, service disruption, or lateral movement within networks. Critical sectors such as telecommunications, manufacturing, and smart city infrastructure that may deploy Huawei devices could be particularly vulnerable. The high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability means sensitive data could be exposed or manipulated, and device functionality could be disrupted. However, the requirement for physical access limits remote exploitation, reducing the risk of widespread remote attacks. Still, insider threats or theft of devices could lead to exploitation. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests that immediate widespread attacks are unlikely, but the vulnerability remains a serious concern for organizations relying on Huawei hardware. Additionally, geopolitical tensions and regulatory scrutiny around Huawei products in Europe may influence the risk posture and response strategies.

CWE-120Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #11
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
V14.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables (opens in a new tab)
Overflow Buffers (opens in a new tab)
Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
MIME Conversion (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/8/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Aug 2025, 03:04 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-120

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats