CVE-2025-5467: CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment in Canonical apport
It was discovered that process_crash() in data/apport in Canonical's Apport crash reporting tool may create crash files with incorrect group ownership, possibly exposing crash information beyond expected or intended groups.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-5467 identifies a vulnerability in the Apport crash reporting tool developed by Canonical, specifically in the process_crash() function located in the data/apport module. Apport is widely used in Ubuntu Linux distributions to collect and report crash data for debugging purposes. The vulnerability arises from incorrect group ownership assignment when creating crash files, potentially allowing these files to be accessible by groups beyond the intended scope. This misconfiguration can lead to unintended information disclosure, exposing sensitive crash details that may contain system or application state information useful to attackers or unauthorized users. The affected versions include multiple releases of Apport (2.20.1 through 2.33.0 and specific Ubuntu package versions), indicating a broad impact across Ubuntu deployments. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 1.9, reflecting low severity due to the requirement for local privileges (AV:L), low attack complexity, no authentication needed beyond local privileges, and limited confidentiality impact. There is no impact on integrity or availability, and no user interaction is necessary. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, suggesting limited active exploitation. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-708 (Incorrect Ownership Assignment), highlighting a common security misconfiguration issue. The lack of available patches at the time of reporting suggests that organizations should monitor for updates or implement manual mitigations. Overall, this vulnerability represents a minor but notable risk of information leakage in Ubuntu environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-5467 is the potential unauthorized disclosure of crash report data due to improper group ownership settings. Crash reports may contain sensitive diagnostic information, including memory dumps, environment variables, or application state, which could aid attackers in reconnaissance or further exploitation. Although the vulnerability requires local privileges, it could be exploited by malicious insiders or attackers who have gained limited access to systems. The confidentiality breach risk is relatively low but could be significant in environments handling sensitive data or critical infrastructure. Since the vulnerability does not affect system integrity or availability, operational disruption is unlikely. However, organizations with strict data privacy regulations, such as GDPR in the EU, must consider the implications of unintended data exposure. The impact is more pronounced in environments where Ubuntu is widely deployed, such as government agencies, research institutions, and enterprises relying on Linux servers or desktops. Overall, the vulnerability poses a minor but avoidable risk to confidentiality in European IT environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-5467, organizations should first monitor Canonical’s official channels for patches or updates addressing the incorrect ownership assignment in Apport. Until patches are available, administrators can implement manual controls by auditing the ownership and permissions of crash report files generated by Apport, ensuring they conform to the principle of least privilege. This can be done by scripting periodic checks or using configuration management tools to enforce correct group ownership. Limiting local user privileges to only trusted personnel reduces the risk of exploitation. Additionally, organizations should consider disabling Apport on systems where crash reporting is not essential or redirecting crash reports to secure locations with restricted access. Implementing file system access controls (e.g., AppArmor or SELinux policies) can further restrict unauthorized access to crash files. Regular security training for system administrators about proper file permission management and monitoring for unusual access patterns can help detect potential misuse. Finally, integrating crash report handling into broader data protection and incident response policies ensures timely identification and remediation of any information disclosure.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-5467: CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment in Canonical apport
Description
It was discovered that process_crash() in data/apport in Canonical's Apport crash reporting tool may create crash files with incorrect group ownership, possibly exposing crash information beyond expected or intended groups.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-5467 identifies a vulnerability in the Apport crash reporting tool developed by Canonical, specifically in the process_crash() function located in the data/apport module. Apport is widely used in Ubuntu Linux distributions to collect and report crash data for debugging purposes. The vulnerability arises from incorrect group ownership assignment when creating crash files, potentially allowing these files to be accessible by groups beyond the intended scope. This misconfiguration can lead to unintended information disclosure, exposing sensitive crash details that may contain system or application state information useful to attackers or unauthorized users. The affected versions include multiple releases of Apport (2.20.1 through 2.33.0 and specific Ubuntu package versions), indicating a broad impact across Ubuntu deployments. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 1.9, reflecting low severity due to the requirement for local privileges (AV:L), low attack complexity, no authentication needed beyond local privileges, and limited confidentiality impact. There is no impact on integrity or availability, and no user interaction is necessary. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, suggesting limited active exploitation. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-708 (Incorrect Ownership Assignment), highlighting a common security misconfiguration issue. The lack of available patches at the time of reporting suggests that organizations should monitor for updates or implement manual mitigations. Overall, this vulnerability represents a minor but notable risk of information leakage in Ubuntu environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-5467 is the potential unauthorized disclosure of crash report data due to improper group ownership settings. Crash reports may contain sensitive diagnostic information, including memory dumps, environment variables, or application state, which could aid attackers in reconnaissance or further exploitation. Although the vulnerability requires local privileges, it could be exploited by malicious insiders or attackers who have gained limited access to systems. The confidentiality breach risk is relatively low but could be significant in environments handling sensitive data or critical infrastructure. Since the vulnerability does not affect system integrity or availability, operational disruption is unlikely. However, organizations with strict data privacy regulations, such as GDPR in the EU, must consider the implications of unintended data exposure. The impact is more pronounced in environments where Ubuntu is widely deployed, such as government agencies, research institutions, and enterprises relying on Linux servers or desktops. Overall, the vulnerability poses a minor but avoidable risk to confidentiality in European IT environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-5467, organizations should first monitor Canonical’s official channels for patches or updates addressing the incorrect ownership assignment in Apport. Until patches are available, administrators can implement manual controls by auditing the ownership and permissions of crash report files generated by Apport, ensuring they conform to the principle of least privilege. This can be done by scripting periodic checks or using configuration management tools to enforce correct group ownership. Limiting local user privileges to only trusted personnel reduces the risk of exploitation. Additionally, organizations should consider disabling Apport on systems where crash reporting is not essential or redirecting crash reports to secure locations with restricted access. Implementing file system access controls (e.g., AppArmor or SELinux policies) can further restrict unauthorized access to crash files. Regular security training for system administrators about proper file permission management and monitoring for unusual access patterns can help detect potential misuse. Finally, integrating crash report handling into broader data protection and incident response policies ensures timely identification and remediation of any information disclosure.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- canonical
- Date Reserved
- 2025-06-02T12:03:56.269Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6939b696fe7b3954b689178f
Added to database: 12/10/2025, 6:06:14 PM
Last enriched: 12/17/2025, 6:35:16 PM
Last updated: 2/5/2026, 10:51:07 PM
Views: 61
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-24302: CWE-284: Improper Access Control in Microsoft Azure ARC
HighCVE-2026-24300: CWE-284: Improper Access Control in Microsoft Azure Front Door
CriticalCVE-2026-21532: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Microsoft Azure Functions
HighCVE-2026-0391: CWE-451: User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information in Microsoft Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)
MediumCVE-2026-1970: Open Redirect in Edimax BR-6258n
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.