CVE-2025-57350VulnerabilityPublished 24 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-57350: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.6 High · fixed in 2.0.10 : patch versions soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.6High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 23% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Affects: versions prior to 2.0.10
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.0.10

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-57350 effectively, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Immediately audit all applications and services that utilize the csvtojson package, identifying versions prior to 2.0.10 and prioritizing their update once a patched version is released. 2) Until patches are available, implement input validation and sanitization controls to detect and reject CSV files containing suspicious header fields, particularly those with '__proto__' or other prototype chain references. 3) Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to monitor and block attempts to exploit prototype pollution via CSV inputs. 4) Isolate CSV processing components in sandboxed or containerized environments to limit the impact of potential exploitation on broader systems. 5) Conduct code reviews and static analysis to identify other potential prototype pollution vectors within the codebase. 6) Enhance logging and monitoring around CSV ingestion points to detect anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 7) Educate development and security teams about prototype pollution risks and secure coding practices related to object property handling in JavaScript. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on immediate risk reduction through input controls and environment isolation while preparing for patch deployment.

Description

The csvtojson package, a tool for converting CSV data to JSON with customizable parsing capabilities, contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in versions prior to 2.0.10. This issue arises due to insufficient sanitization of nested header names during the parsing process in the parser_jsonarray component. When processing CSV input containing specially crafted header fields that reference prototype chains (e.g., using __proto__ syntax), the application may unintentionally modify properties of the base Object prototype. This vulnerability can lead to denial of service conditions or unexpected behavior in applications relying on unmodified prototype chains, particularly when untrusted CSV data is processed. The flaw does not require user interaction beyond providing a maliciously constructed CSV file.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-57350 can be substantial, especially for those relying on the csvtojson package in their data processing pipelines, analytics platforms, or web applications that ingest CSV data from external or untrusted sources. Prototype pollution can compromise application integrity by corrupting internal object states, potentially leading to application crashes, denial of service, or erratic behavior that undermines data processing reliability. This can disrupt business operations, cause data processing errors, or open indirect avenues for further exploitation if attackers leverage the polluted prototype to escalate privileges or bypass security controls. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, which often handle large volumes of CSV data for reporting or integration, are particularly at risk. Additionally, the ease of exploitation without user interaction increases the threat surface, as attackers can automate attacks by submitting malicious CSV files through exposed interfaces or APIs. The lack of immediate patches means organizations must act proactively to mitigate risk. Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to operational downtime, reputational damage, and potential regulatory compliance issues under frameworks like GDPR if data integrity or availability is compromised.

CWE-1321Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') (opens in a new tab)
Variant weakness
The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies attributes that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control modifications of attributes of the object prototype.
Implementation
By freezing the object prototype first (for example, Object.freeze(Object.prototype)), modification of the prototype becomes impossible.
Architecture and Design
By blocking modifications of attributes that resolve to object prototype, such as proto or prototype, this weakness can be mitigated.
Implementation · Input Validation
When handling untrusted objects, validating using a schema can be used.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (opens in a new tab)
Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (opens in a new tab)
Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Sep 2025, 18:16 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1321

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats