CVE-2025-57837VulnerabilityPublished 20 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-57837: Honor FCP-AN10 · Information Exposure

Affects Honor FCP-AN10Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.9 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

2.9Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 6% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Honor FCP-AN10	Affected =8.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Restrict physical and logical access to Honor FCP-AN10 devices to trusted personnel only, minimizing the risk of local exploitation. 2. Monitor device usage and access logs to detect any unauthorized local access attempts. 3. Implement network segmentation to isolate devices and limit exposure if compromised. 4. Stay in contact with Honor for official patches or firmware updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 5. Conduct regular security audits on devices to identify any unusual behavior or data leaks. 6. Educate staff about the risks of local device access and enforce strict access control policies. 7. Consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of monitoring local device activities for suspicious actions related to Tileservice or similar modules.

Description

CVE-2025-57837 is an information disclosure vulnerability in the Tileservice module of the Honor FCP-AN10 device running version 8.0. The flaw allows unauthorized local attackers to access sensitive information, potentially compromising service confidentiality. The vulnerability has a low CVSS score of 2.9 due to its limited attack vector (local access required), high attack complexity, and no impact on integrity or availability. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. European organizations using this specific Honor device may face minor confidentiality risks if devices are physically or logically accessible by unauthorized users. Mitigation involves restricting local access, monitoring device usage, and applying vendor patches once available. Countries with higher Honor device adoption and strategic use of such devices in enterprise or government sectors are more likely to be affected. Overall, the threat is low severity but should be addressed to prevent potential data leaks in sensitive environments.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact is the potential unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information from affected Honor FCP-AN10 devices. This could lead to confidentiality breaches, especially in environments where these devices handle sensitive communications or data. Since exploitation requires local access and has high complexity, the risk is mainly from insider threats or attackers who have already gained some level of physical or logical access to the device. The lack of impact on integrity and availability means operational disruption is unlikely. However, leaked information could aid attackers in further reconnaissance or lateral movement within networks. Organizations in sectors such as government, telecommunications, or enterprises using Honor devices for critical functions may face increased risk. The overall impact is low but should not be ignored in high-security contexts.

Summary

CVE-2025-57837 identifies a vulnerability classified under CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) affecting the Tileservice module of the Honor FCP-AN10 product, specifically version 8.0. The Tileservice module is responsible for certain system-level functionalities, and the vulnerability allows unauthorized actors to leak sensitive information, impacting confidentiality. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) indicates that the attack requires local access (AV:L), has high attack complexity (AC:H), does not require privileges (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N), and only affects confidentiality (C:L) without impacting integrity or availability. The vulnerability was published on October 20, 2025, with no known exploits in the wild and no patches currently available. The lack of remote exploitation and the high complexity reduce the risk, but the exposure of sensitive information could still be leveraged in targeted attacks or combined with other vulnerabilities. The vulnerability's presence in a specific device model used in certain environments means that the threat surface is limited but relevant for organizations deploying these devices. The Tileservice module's exact nature is not fully detailed, but given its system-level role, leaked information could include configuration details or sensitive operational data.

CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #20OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Subverting Environment Variable Values (opens in a new tab)
ICMP Echo Request Ping (opens in a new tab)
TCP SYN Scan (opens in a new tab)
Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) Records (opens in a new tab)
DNS Zone Transfers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

honor.com/global/security/cve-2025-57837/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Oct 2025, 12:59 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-200

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats