CVE-2025-59104: dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k7 · Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks
Affects dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k7Source CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.0 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 8% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| dormakabaAccess Manager 92xx-k7 | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
1. Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to dormakaba devices, including surveillance, access restrictions, and tamper-evident seals. 2. Regularly inspect devices for signs of tampering such as soldering or cable attachments. 3. Implement environmental monitoring to detect physical intrusion attempts near access control hardware. 4. Segregate access control devices on isolated networks to limit potential lateral movement if compromised. 5. Maintain an inventory of all affected devices and prioritize upgrades once patches or firmware updates become available from dormakaba. 6. Engage with dormakaba support to obtain timelines for patches or mitigations. 7. Train security personnel to recognize and respond to physical tampering attempts. 8. Consider deploying additional layers of authentication or multi-factor access controls to reduce reliance on vulnerable hardware. 9. Monitor access logs and device behavior for anomalies that may indicate compromise. 10. Develop incident response plans specific to physical device compromise scenarios.
Description
With physical access to the device and enough time an attacker is able to solder test leads to the debug footprint (or use the 6-Pin tag-connect cable). Thus, the attacker gains access to the bootloader, where the kernel command line can be changed. An attacker is able to gain a root shell through this vulnerability.