CVE-2025-5926: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in jconti Link Shield
The Link Shield plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link_shield_menu_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-5926 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting the Link Shield plugin for WordPress, developed by jconti. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 0.5.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the link_shield_menu_options() function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that a request comes from a legitimate source, preventing unauthorized actions. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an attacker to craft a malicious request that, when executed by an authenticated site administrator (e.g., by clicking a link), can update plugin settings or inject malicious scripts. This attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated but relies on social engineering to trick an administrator into performing the action. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity by enabling unauthorized modification of plugin settings and potential script injection, but it does not affect availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.1 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, scope changed, and low impact on confidentiality and integrity. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been published at the time of analysis. Given the plugin’s integration with WordPress, a widely used CMS, the vulnerability could be leveraged to compromise site configurations or facilitate further attacks such as persistent cross-site scripting (XSS).
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress with the Link Shield plugin, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized changes in security-related plugin settings, potentially weakening site defenses or enabling malicious payloads to be injected and executed in the context of the administrator’s browser. This could result in data leakage, session hijacking, or further compromise of the website and its users. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on WordPress for public-facing websites, such as media, e-commerce, and government services, may face reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny if customer or citizen data is exposed. The requirement for user interaction (administrator clicking a malicious link) somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where phishing attacks are common. The vulnerability does not directly impact availability, so denial of service is unlikely. However, the integrity and confidentiality impacts could facilitate broader attacks, including supply chain compromises or lateral movement within networks if the website is used as a foothold.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting administrative access to trusted networks and enforcing strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all WordPress administrators to reduce the risk of successful social engineering. 2. Administrators should be trained to recognize phishing attempts and avoid clicking on suspicious links, especially when logged into WordPress dashboards. 3. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the impact of potential script injections. 4. Monitor WordPress plugin settings and logs for unauthorized changes or suspicious activity. 5. If possible, temporarily disable or remove the Link Shield plugin until a vendor patch is released. 6. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting the plugin’s endpoints. 7. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions once the vendor releases a patch addressing this vulnerability. 8. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing focusing on administrative interfaces to detect similar weaknesses.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-5926: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in jconti Link Shield
Description
The Link Shield plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link_shield_menu_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-5926 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting the Link Shield plugin for WordPress, developed by jconti. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 0.5.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the link_shield_menu_options() function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that a request comes from a legitimate source, preventing unauthorized actions. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an attacker to craft a malicious request that, when executed by an authenticated site administrator (e.g., by clicking a link), can update plugin settings or inject malicious scripts. This attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated but relies on social engineering to trick an administrator into performing the action. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity by enabling unauthorized modification of plugin settings and potential script injection, but it does not affect availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.1 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, scope changed, and low impact on confidentiality and integrity. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been published at the time of analysis. Given the plugin’s integration with WordPress, a widely used CMS, the vulnerability could be leveraged to compromise site configurations or facilitate further attacks such as persistent cross-site scripting (XSS).
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress with the Link Shield plugin, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized changes in security-related plugin settings, potentially weakening site defenses or enabling malicious payloads to be injected and executed in the context of the administrator’s browser. This could result in data leakage, session hijacking, or further compromise of the website and its users. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on WordPress for public-facing websites, such as media, e-commerce, and government services, may face reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny if customer or citizen data is exposed. The requirement for user interaction (administrator clicking a malicious link) somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where phishing attacks are common. The vulnerability does not directly impact availability, so denial of service is unlikely. However, the integrity and confidentiality impacts could facilitate broader attacks, including supply chain compromises or lateral movement within networks if the website is used as a foothold.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting administrative access to trusted networks and enforcing strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all WordPress administrators to reduce the risk of successful social engineering. 2. Administrators should be trained to recognize phishing attempts and avoid clicking on suspicious links, especially when logged into WordPress dashboards. 3. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the impact of potential script injections. 4. Monitor WordPress plugin settings and logs for unauthorized changes or suspicious activity. 5. If possible, temporarily disable or remove the Link Shield plugin until a vendor patch is released. 6. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting the plugin’s endpoints. 7. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions once the vendor releases a patch addressing this vulnerability. 8. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing focusing on administrative interfaces to detect similar weaknesses.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-06-09T14:34:21.758Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 684b8f23358c65714e6b5798
Added to database: 6/13/2025, 2:38:27 AM
Last enriched: 6/13/2025, 2:55:06 AM
Last updated: 7/31/2025, 2:10:45 PM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8142: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in pencidesign Soledad
HighCVE-2025-8105: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in pencidesign Soledad
HighCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.