Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-5930: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in digitalacornjp WP2HTML

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-5930cvecve-2025-5930cwe-352
Published: Fri Jun 13 2025 (06/13/2025, 01:47:48 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: digitalacornjp
Product: WP2HTML

Description

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/27/2026, 15:41:38 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-5930 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP2HTML plugin for WordPress, maintained by digitalacornjp. The vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.0.2 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the save() function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent unauthorized actions. The absence or improper implementation of nonce checks allows an attacker to craft a malicious request that, when executed by an authenticated site administrator (e.g., by clicking a specially crafted link), can modify the plugin’s settings without the administrator’s explicit consent. This attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated, but it does require user interaction from a privileged user. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the plugin’s configuration, potentially leading to unauthorized changes that could affect site behavior or security posture. The CVSS v3.1 score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity level due to the ease of exploitation (network vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but user interaction needed) and limited impact (no confidentiality or availability impact, only integrity). No public exploits have been reported yet, and no official patches are linked, indicating that mitigation may require manual nonce implementation or plugin updates once available.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity of the affected WordPress sites using the WP2HTML plugin. An attacker can alter plugin settings without authentication by exploiting the CSRF flaw, potentially leading to unauthorized configuration changes that could degrade site functionality, introduce security weaknesses, or facilitate further attacks. While confidentiality and availability are not directly affected, the unauthorized modification of plugin settings can indirectly compromise site security or stability. Organizations relying on WP2HTML may face risks of site misconfiguration, loss of trust, or operational disruption. Since exploitation requires an administrator to interact with a malicious link, social engineering is a key factor. The medium severity rating reflects these factors, but the widespread use of WordPress and the plugin could amplify the impact if exploited at scale.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-5930, organizations should first check for and apply any official patches or updates released by digitalacornjp addressing nonce validation in WP2HTML. If no patch is available, administrators should consider disabling or removing the plugin until a fix is released. Implementing proper nonce validation in the save() function is critical; this involves verifying the nonce token on all state-changing requests to ensure they originate from legitimate users. Additionally, administrators should educate site users about the risks of clicking untrusted links and consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with CSRF protections or rules that detect suspicious POST requests. Monitoring for unusual plugin configuration changes and auditing administrator activity can help detect exploitation attempts. Restricting administrative access and using multi-factor authentication can reduce the risk of successful social engineering attacks.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-06-09T14:46:26.544Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 684b8f24358c65714e6b57aa

Added to database: 6/13/2025, 2:38:28 AM

Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 3:41:38 PM

Last updated: 3/26/2026, 7:58:23 AM

Views: 61

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses