CVE-2025-59348VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-59348: dragonflyoss dragonfly · Use of Uninitialized Variable

Affects dragonflyoss dragonflySource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium : upgrade to 2.1.0 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.1.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade dragonflyoss dragonfly to 2.1.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
dragonflyoss dragonfly	Affected <2.1.0	Fixed in 2.1.0

AI-suggested

European organizations should upgrade all Dragonfly deployments to version 2.1.0 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. Until upgrades can be applied, organizations should implement network-level controls to restrict access to Dragonfly peers, limiting exposure to untrusted or external networks. Monitoring traffic patterns for abnormal bandwidth usage or peer behavior can help detect exploitation attempts. Rate limiting and resource usage policies should be reviewed and enforced at the infrastructure level to mitigate the impact of any misbehaving peers. Additionally, organizations should conduct code audits and testing on custom integrations with Dragonfly to ensure no similar uninitialized variable issues exist. Employing runtime application self-protection (RASP) or behavior-based anomaly detection tools can provide early warning of exploitation attempts. Finally, maintaining an inventory of Dragonfly instances and their versions will facilitate rapid identification and remediation of vulnerable deployments.

Description

Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, the processPieceFromSource method does not update the structure’s usedTraffic field, because an uninitialized variable n is used as a guard to the AddTraffic method call, instead of the result.Size variable. A task is processed by a peer. The usedTraffic metadata is not updated during the processing. Rate limiting is incorrectly applied, leading to a denial-of-service condition for the peer. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0.

Impact

For European organizations utilizing Dragonfly for file distribution or image acceleration, this vulnerability could lead to denial-of-service (DoS) conditions within their peer-to-peer infrastructure. Since Dragonfly is designed to optimize content delivery and reduce load on origin servers, disruption caused by this flaw could degrade service availability, increase latency, and reduce overall system reliability. This is particularly impactful for enterprises relying on Dragonfly for large-scale software distribution, container image delivery, or content caching. The improper rate limiting could allow malicious or malfunctioning peers to exhaust bandwidth or processing resources, potentially impacting other legitimate peers and causing cascading service degradation. While confidentiality and integrity impacts are minimal or nonexistent, availability degradation can disrupt critical business operations, especially in sectors dependent on continuous content delivery such as media, software development, and cloud services. The lack of authentication requirements means attackers can exploit this remotely without credentials, increasing the risk of widespread disruption if Dragonfly is exposed to untrusted networks. However, the absence of known exploits in the wild suggests that immediate risk is moderate, but organizations should prioritize patching to prevent future exploitation.

CWE-457Use of Uninitialized Variable (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: High
The code uses a variable that has not been initialized, leading to unpredictable or unintended results.
Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Ensure that critical variables are initialized before first use.
Build and Compilation · Compilation or Build Hardening
Most compilers will complain about the use of uninitialized variables if warnings are turned on.
Implementation · Operation
When using a language that does not require explicit declaration of variables, run or compile the software in a mode that reports undeclared or unknown variables. This may indicate the presence of a typographic error in the variable's name.
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2025, 19:37 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-457

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats