CVE-2025-59353: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in dragonflyoss dragonfly
Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, a peer can obtain a valid TLS certificate for arbitrary IP addresses, effectively rendering the mTLS authentication useless. The issue is that the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service does not validate if the requested IP addresses “belong to” the peer requesting the certificate—that is, if the peer connects from the same IP address as the one provided in the certificate request. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-59353 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting versions of the open-source Dragonfly P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system prior to 2.1.0. The core issue lies in improper certificate validation within the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service. Specifically, the service fails to verify that the IP address requested in a TLS certificate actually belongs to the peer making the request. This flaw allows a malicious peer to obtain a valid TLS certificate for arbitrary IP addresses without proving ownership or control over those IPs. As a result, the mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication mechanism, which is designed to ensure secure and authenticated communication between peers, can be completely bypassed. An attacker could impersonate other peers or services by presenting a valid certificate for an IP address they do not control, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle attacks, unauthorized data access, or disruption of the file distribution network. The vulnerability is identified as CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) and CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), highlighting the lack of proper validation and authorization checks. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.7 (high), reflecting the network attack vector, no required privileges or user interaction, and a significant impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability was fixed in Dragonfly version 2.1.0 by implementing proper validation to ensure that the IP address in the certificate request matches the peer’s actual IP address. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the ease of exploitation and the critical role of mTLS in securing peer communications make this a significant threat to affected deployments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Dragonfly versions prior to 2.1.0, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk to the confidentiality and integrity of their file distribution and image acceleration workflows. An attacker exploiting this flaw could impersonate legitimate peers within the network, intercept or alter distributed files, or disrupt service availability by injecting malicious content or causing trust failures. This could lead to data breaches, supply chain compromise, or operational downtime. Given that Dragonfly is often used in cloud-native environments and container image distribution, the vulnerability could affect DevOps pipelines, software supply chains, and internal distribution of critical updates. European organizations with stringent data protection regulations such as GDPR must be particularly cautious, as exploitation could result in unauthorized data exposure and regulatory non-compliance. Additionally, the disruption of image acceleration services could impact business continuity and service delivery, especially in sectors relying on rapid and secure software deployment such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing.
Mitigation Recommendations
The primary mitigation is to upgrade all Dragonfly instances to version 2.1.0 or later, where the certificate validation flaw has been corrected. Organizations should audit their environments to identify any deployments running vulnerable versions and prioritize patching. In addition, network segmentation and strict access controls should be enforced to limit peer communication to trusted IP ranges and authenticated entities. Implementing additional monitoring on the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service for anomalous certificate requests or unexpected IP address bindings can help detect exploitation attempts. Where feasible, organizations should consider deploying network-level TLS inspection and anomaly detection tools to identify suspicious mTLS traffic patterns. Finally, integrating Dragonfly usage into broader supply chain security and vulnerability management programs will help ensure timely detection and remediation of similar issues in the future.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-59353: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in dragonflyoss dragonfly
Description
Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, a peer can obtain a valid TLS certificate for arbitrary IP addresses, effectively rendering the mTLS authentication useless. The issue is that the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service does not validate if the requested IP addresses “belong to” the peer requesting the certificate—that is, if the peer connects from the same IP address as the one provided in the certificate request. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-59353 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting versions of the open-source Dragonfly P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system prior to 2.1.0. The core issue lies in improper certificate validation within the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service. Specifically, the service fails to verify that the IP address requested in a TLS certificate actually belongs to the peer making the request. This flaw allows a malicious peer to obtain a valid TLS certificate for arbitrary IP addresses without proving ownership or control over those IPs. As a result, the mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication mechanism, which is designed to ensure secure and authenticated communication between peers, can be completely bypassed. An attacker could impersonate other peers or services by presenting a valid certificate for an IP address they do not control, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle attacks, unauthorized data access, or disruption of the file distribution network. The vulnerability is identified as CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) and CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), highlighting the lack of proper validation and authorization checks. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.7 (high), reflecting the network attack vector, no required privileges or user interaction, and a significant impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability was fixed in Dragonfly version 2.1.0 by implementing proper validation to ensure that the IP address in the certificate request matches the peer’s actual IP address. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the ease of exploitation and the critical role of mTLS in securing peer communications make this a significant threat to affected deployments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Dragonfly versions prior to 2.1.0, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk to the confidentiality and integrity of their file distribution and image acceleration workflows. An attacker exploiting this flaw could impersonate legitimate peers within the network, intercept or alter distributed files, or disrupt service availability by injecting malicious content or causing trust failures. This could lead to data breaches, supply chain compromise, or operational downtime. Given that Dragonfly is often used in cloud-native environments and container image distribution, the vulnerability could affect DevOps pipelines, software supply chains, and internal distribution of critical updates. European organizations with stringent data protection regulations such as GDPR must be particularly cautious, as exploitation could result in unauthorized data exposure and regulatory non-compliance. Additionally, the disruption of image acceleration services could impact business continuity and service delivery, especially in sectors relying on rapid and secure software deployment such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing.
Mitigation Recommendations
The primary mitigation is to upgrade all Dragonfly instances to version 2.1.0 or later, where the certificate validation flaw has been corrected. Organizations should audit their environments to identify any deployments running vulnerable versions and prioritize patching. In addition, network segmentation and strict access controls should be enforced to limit peer communication to trusted IP ranges and authenticated entities. Implementing additional monitoring on the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service for anomalous certificate requests or unexpected IP address bindings can help detect exploitation attempts. Where feasible, organizations should consider deploying network-level TLS inspection and anomaly detection tools to identify suspicious mTLS traffic patterns. Finally, integrating Dragonfly usage into broader supply chain security and vulnerability management programs will help ensure timely detection and remediation of similar issues in the future.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-12T12:36:24.637Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68cb4e06e5fa2c8b1490b384
Added to database: 9/18/2025, 12:10:46 AM
Last enriched: 9/25/2025, 12:38:15 AM
Last updated: 10/31/2025, 7:02:00 PM
Views: 41
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-63454: n/a
HighCVE-2025-12547: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in LogicalDOC Community Edition
MediumCVE-2025-12546: Cross Site Scripting in LogicalDOC Community Edition
MediumCVE-2025-62267: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Liferay Portal
MediumCVE-2025-62264: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Liferay Portal
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.