Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-59693: n/a

0
Critical
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-59693cvecve-2025-59693
Published: Tue Dec 02 2025 (12/02/2025, 00:00:00 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5

Description

The Chassis Management Board in Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7, allows a physically proximate attacker to obtain debug access and escalate privileges by bypassing the tamper label and opening the chassis without leaving evidence, and accessing the JTAG connector. This is called F02.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 12/02/2025, 14:58:02 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-59693 identifies a hardware security vulnerability in Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi devices up to versions 13.6.11 and 13.7. These HSMs are designed to securely generate, store, and manage cryptographic keys and perform cryptographic operations in a tamper-resistant environment. The vulnerability arises from the Chassis Management Board, which allows a physically proximate attacker to bypass the tamper-evident label protecting the device chassis. By doing so, the attacker can open the chassis without triggering tamper alerts or leaving evidence of intrusion. Once inside, the attacker can access the JTAG (Joint Test Action Group) connector, a hardware debugging interface typically used for development and troubleshooting. Access to JTAG enables the attacker to gain debug access, escalate privileges, and potentially extract sensitive cryptographic material or manipulate the HSM's firmware and operations. This attack requires physical proximity but no specialized authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability undermines the fundamental security guarantees of the HSM, threatening confidentiality and integrity of cryptographic keys and operations. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the risk is significant given the critical role of these devices in securing sensitive data and infrastructure.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a critical risk to the security of cryptographic keys and operations protected by Entrust nShield HSMs. These devices are widely used in sectors such as banking, government, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure to secure digital identities, financial transactions, and sensitive communications. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized key extraction, enabling attackers to decrypt confidential data, forge digital signatures, or impersonate trusted entities. The stealthy nature of the attack—bypassing tamper evidence—complicates incident detection and response. This could result in prolonged undetected compromises, undermining trust in cryptographic protections and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and NIS Directive. Additionally, the ability to escalate privileges and manipulate HSM firmware could facilitate further attacks on connected systems. The physical access requirement limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with shared or insufficiently secured hardware rooms or data centers.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Enhance physical security controls around Entrust nShield HSMs, including restricted access to hardware rooms, surveillance, and security personnel. 2. Implement multi-factor authentication and strict access policies for all personnel with physical access to HSMs. 3. Regularly inspect HSM chassis and tamper-evident seals for signs of unauthorized access, and consider using more robust tamper-evident technologies resistant to bypass. 4. Coordinate with Entrust to obtain firmware updates or patches that may address or mitigate this vulnerability once available. 5. Employ hardware security monitoring tools that can detect anomalous debug or JTAG activity. 6. Segregate HSMs in secure enclosures or locked cabinets with additional tamper detection sensors. 7. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on physical security controls. 8. Develop incident response plans specifically addressing physical tampering scenarios. 9. Limit the number of personnel with physical access and enforce strict logging of all access events. 10. Consider alternative HSM solutions with stronger physical tamper protections if risk cannot be adequately mitigated.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
mitre
Date Reserved
2025-09-18T00:00:00.000Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 692eface3a1612a93732dde2

Added to database: 12/2/2025, 2:42:22 PM

Last enriched: 12/2/2025, 2:58:02 PM

Last updated: 12/5/2025, 1:24:47 AM

Views: 14

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats