CVE-2025-61549VulnerabilityPublished 8 Jan 2026Updated 10 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-61549: vulnerability-disclosures · n/a

Affects vulnerability-disclosuresSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium · fixed in 19.76 : update vulnerability-disclosures when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 16% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 19.76

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubchndlrx/vulnerability-disclosures`pkg:github/chndlrx/vulnerability-disclosures`Other threats	Affected =18.34	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Upgrade immediately to edu Business Solutions Print Shop Pro WebDesk version 19.76 or later, where the vulnerability is fixed. 2. Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially the LoginID parameter, to prevent script injection. 3. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block XSS payloads targeting the affected endpoint. 4. Conduct security awareness training to reduce the risk of successful phishing or social engineering attacks that could trigger the vulnerability. 5. Restrict access to the Print Shop Pro WebDesk web interface to trusted networks or VPNs to limit exposure. 6. Monitor web server logs for suspicious requests containing script tags or unusual parameters targeting /PSP/app/web/reg/reg_display.asp. 7. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers accessing the application. 8. Regularly scan web applications with automated tools to detect XSS and other injection vulnerabilities. 9. Review session management practices to ensure cookies are marked HttpOnly and Secure to reduce session hijacking risks. 10. Coordinate with the vendor for any additional security advisories or patches.

Description

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is present on the LoginID parameter on the /PSP/app/web/reg/reg_display.asp endpoint in edu Business Solutions Print Shop Pro WebDesk version 18.34 (fixed in 19.76). Unsanitized user input is reflected in HTTP responses without proper HTML encoding or escaping. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a victim s browser session

Impact

For European organizations, this XSS vulnerability poses risks primarily to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions within the Print Shop Pro WebDesk environment. Attackers could leverage the flaw to steal session cookies, perform actions on behalf of authenticated users, or deliver malicious payloads leading to further compromise. While availability is not directly impacted, the breach of user trust and potential data leakage could have regulatory and reputational consequences, especially under GDPR. Organizations relying on this software for print management or workflow automation may face operational disruptions if attackers exploit the vulnerability to escalate privileges or pivot within the network. The medium severity score reflects the need for timely remediation but indicates that the risk is somewhat mitigated by the requirement for user interaction. However, phishing or social engineering campaigns could increase exploitation likelihood. European entities with exposed web interfaces or insufficient web application firewall (WAF) protections are particularly vulnerable. The impact is heightened in sectors with sensitive data or critical infrastructure relying on this software.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

github.com/chndlrx/vulnerability-disclosures/tree/main/CVE-2025-61549 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Feb 2026, 11:04 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats