Skip to main content
CVE-2025-61724VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-61724: Go standard library net/textproto · Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity

Affects Go standard library net/textprotoSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
5.3Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 46% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 29 Oct 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Gonet/textprotopkg:golang/net/textprotoOther threatsAffected
  • =0
  • =1.25.0
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Until a fix is available, consider limiting exposure to untrusted inputs that might trigger this behavior or applying application-level rate limiting to mitigate potential denial of service.

Description

CVE-2025-61724 is a medium severity vulnerability in the Go standard library's net/textproto package. The Reader.ReadResponse function uses repeated string concatenation to build response strings from multiple lines, causing inefficient algorithmic complexity. This inefficiency can lead to excessive CPU consumption and denial of service due to resource exhaustion. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity. No patch or official fix has been confirmed yet.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…