VulnerabilityPublished 21 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-61761: Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management · Improper Access Control

Affects Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance ManagementSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 7% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 21 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Oracle Corporation PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management	Affected =9.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict HTTP access to PeopleSoft FIN Maintenance Management interfaces only to trusted internal networks and authorized personnel.
Enforce strong authentication mechanisms and monitor for unusual login patterns to detect potential misuse of low privilege accounts.
Apply the principle of least privilege rigorously, ensuring users have only the minimum necessary access rights within PeopleSoft.
Monitor and audit all data modification activities within the FIN Maintenance Management module to detect unauthorized insert, update, or delete operations.
Deploy intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) tuned to detect anomalous HTTP requests targeting PeopleSoft endpoints.
Stay informed about Oracle’s security advisories and apply patches immediately once they become available.
Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on access control weaknesses in PeopleSoft environments.
Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAF) with custom rules to block suspicious HTTP traffic targeting known vulnerable endpoints.
Educate users about credential security to reduce risk of account compromise.
Develop and test incident response plans specific to PeopleSoft data integrity incidents.

Description

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Work Order Management). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Maintenance Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of financial maintenance data managed through PeopleSoft FIN Maintenance Management 9.2. Unauthorized data manipulation could lead to financial discrepancies, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. Organizations in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, utilities, and public administration that rely on PeopleSoft for maintenance management are particularly vulnerable. The ability of an attacker to insert, update, or delete data could facilitate fraudulent activities or disrupt operational workflows. Confidential data exposure could also violate GDPR requirements, leading to legal and financial penalties. Since the vulnerability requires only low privileges and network access, insider threats or compromised credentials could be leveraged to exploit this flaw. The absence of availability impact means operational continuity is less likely to be affected, but the integrity and confidentiality breaches could have cascading effects on business processes and trustworthiness of financial records.

CWE-284Improper Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Pillar weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #19OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Embedding Scripts within Scripts (opens in a new tab)
Modification of Windows Service Configuration (opens in a new tab)
Malicious Root Certificate (opens in a new tab)
Intent Spoof (opens in a new tab)
WebView Exposure (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2025.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Oct 2025, 22:01 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-284

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats