CVE-2025-63469VulnerabilityPublished 31 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-63469: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 35% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 31 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-63469, organizations should first identify any Totolink LR350 routers running the vulnerable firmware version 9.3.5u.6369_B20220309 within their network. Since no official patches are currently available, network administrators should implement compensating controls such as restricting access to router management interfaces via firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks. Disabling remote management features or changing default management ports can reduce attack surface. Monitoring network traffic for unusual or malformed ssid parameter requests may help detect exploitation attempts. Organizations should maintain regular backups of router configurations to enable rapid recovery after a DoS event. Engaging with Totolink support or vendor channels to obtain firmware updates or security advisories is critical. Once a patch is released, prompt firmware upgrade is essential. Additionally, consider deploying network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) with signatures targeting malformed ssid requests to alert on potential attacks. For environments where Totolink devices are critical, evaluating alternative hardware with better security track records may be warranted.

Description

Totolink LR350 v9.3.5u.6369_B20220309 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the ssid parameter in the sub_421BAC function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted request.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-63469 is the potential disruption of network services due to router crashes or reboots caused by the stack overflow. This can lead to temporary loss of internet connectivity, affecting business operations, communications, and access to cloud services. Organizations relying on Totolink LR350 routers, especially in small office or home office environments, may face increased risk if these devices are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet. The lack of authentication requirement for exploitation means attackers can remotely trigger the DoS without prior access, increasing the threat surface. While the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity directly, the availability impact can cause operational downtime and potential productivity losses. Additionally, repeated exploitation attempts could lead to network instability and increased support costs. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk, but the vulnerability's public disclosure may prompt attackers to develop exploits. European sectors with critical reliance on stable network infrastructure, such as finance, healthcare, and government, could be indirectly affected if such devices are part of their network edge or remote access infrastructure.

CWE-121Stack-based Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #14
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation
Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

github.com/0-fool/VulnbyCola/blob/main/TOTOLINK/LR350/5/1.md (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 31 Oct 2025, 16:46 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-121

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats