VulnerabilityPublished 20 Jun 2025Updated 23 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6365: HobbesOSR Kitten · Resource Consumption

Affects HobbesOSR KittenSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 53% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: High
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: High: There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Network Segmentation: Limit access to systems running HobbesOSR Kitten on ARM64 to trusted network segments to reduce the risk of adjacent network attackers exploiting the vulnerability.
Monitoring and Resource Limits: Implement monitoring of system resource usage and configure resource limits (e.g., cgroups or kernel resource quotas) to detect and mitigate abnormal resource consumption patterns.
Vendor Coordination: Engage with HobbesOSR for timely updates or patches despite the rolling release model; subscribe to vendor security advisories to receive notifications.
Access Controls: Restrict low-privilege user access on affected systems to minimize the risk of exploitation since low privileges are sufficient to exploit this vulnerability.
Incident Response Preparedness: Prepare incident response plans to quickly identify and respond to potential denial of service or resource exhaustion incidents.
Alternative Platforms: Where feasible, consider migrating critical workloads to more widely supported operating systems with established patching and support mechanisms to reduce dependency on niche products with limited vulnerability management visibility.

Description

A vulnerability was found in HobbesOSR Kitten up to c4f8b7c3158983d1020af432be1b417b28686736 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function set_pte_at in the library /include/arch-arm64/pgtable.h. The manipulation leads to resource consumption. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for resource exhaustion attacks that could degrade or disrupt critical systems running HobbesOSR Kitten on ARM64 hardware. This could affect availability of services, especially in environments where ARM64-based servers or embedded devices are used, such as telecommunications infrastructure, IoT deployments, or edge computing nodes. Given the medium CVSS score and the requirement for adjacent network access and low privileges, attackers within the same network segment could exploit this vulnerability to cause denial of service conditions without needing user interaction. This could disrupt business operations, cause downtime, and potentially impact critical infrastructure services. The lack of detailed versioning and patch information complicates timely remediation, increasing the window of exposure. Since HobbesOSR Kitten is a niche or specialized product, the impact is likely concentrated in organizations using this specific OS or kernel variant, but those organizations could face significant operational risks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…