Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-64131: Vulnerability in Jenkins Project Jenkins SAML Plugin

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-64131cvecve-2025-64131
Published: Wed Oct 29 2025 (10/29/2025, 13:29:39 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Jenkins Project
Product: Jenkins SAML Plugin

Description

Jenkins SAML Plugin 4.583.vc68232f7018a_ and earlier does not implement a replay cache, allowing attackers able to obtain information about the SAML authentication flow between a user's web browser and Jenkins to replay those requests, authenticating to Jenkins as that user.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/05/2025, 15:51:28 UTC

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-64131 affects the Jenkins SAML Plugin version 4.583.vc68232f7018a_ and earlier. The core issue is the absence of a replay cache mechanism within the plugin's SAML authentication process. SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) is a widely used protocol for single sign-on (SSO) that exchanges authentication and authorization data between identity providers and service providers like Jenkins. Without a replay cache, the plugin fails to detect and block replayed authentication requests. An attacker who can intercept or observe the SAML authentication flow—typically by network sniffing or man-in-the-middle techniques—can capture valid authentication tokens or requests. By replaying these captured requests, the attacker can impersonate legitimate users and gain unauthorized access to Jenkins instances. This access could allow attackers to manipulate build pipelines, access sensitive source code, or disrupt continuous integration and deployment processes. The vulnerability does not require prior authentication but does require the attacker to observe or intercept the SAML messages, which may involve some user interaction or network access. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 indicates high severity, with network attack vector, high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and user interaction required. No known exploits have been reported in the wild yet, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk given Jenkins' critical role in software development environments.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is substantial. Jenkins is widely used across Europe in software development, DevOps, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Unauthorized access to Jenkins through replay attacks can lead to exposure of sensitive source code, intellectual property theft, insertion of malicious code into builds, disruption of development workflows, and potential downstream impacts on production environments. Confidentiality is compromised as attackers can access user sessions; integrity is at risk because attackers can alter build configurations or inject malicious artifacts; availability can be affected if attackers disrupt or disable Jenkins services. Given the reliance on Jenkins for critical development operations, exploitation could cause significant operational and reputational damage. European organizations in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, and technology, which rely heavily on secure software development practices, are particularly vulnerable. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high severity score underscores the urgency of addressing this issue.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Monitor Jenkins SAML Plugin vendor announcements closely and apply security patches immediately once available to address the replay cache deficiency. 2. Implement network-level protections such as TLS encryption for all SAML traffic to prevent interception and replay of authentication messages. 3. Use web application firewalls (WAFs) and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to detect and block suspicious replay attempts or anomalous authentication patterns. 4. Enforce strict session management policies in Jenkins, including short session lifetimes and multi-factor authentication (MFA) where possible, to reduce the impact of replayed sessions. 5. Conduct regular audits of Jenkins authentication logs to identify repeated or unusual login attempts indicative of replay attacks. 6. Segment Jenkins infrastructure within secure network zones to limit exposure to potential attackers capable of intercepting SAML traffic. 7. Educate development and operations teams about the risks of replay attacks and encourage vigilance regarding suspicious authentication behaviors. 8. Consider alternative or additional authentication mechanisms that provide replay protection until the plugin is patched.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
jenkins
Date Reserved
2025-10-28T07:34:37.541Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69021a8414cc779bff050fc8

Added to database: 10/29/2025, 1:45:40 PM

Last enriched: 11/5/2025, 3:51:28 PM

Last updated: 12/14/2025, 12:40:32 PM

Views: 199

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats