CVE-2025-64226: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in colabrio Stockie Extra
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in colabrio Stockie Extra stockie-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stockie Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.11.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-64226 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the colabrio Stockie Extra product, affecting all versions up to and including 1.2.11. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when a web application does not adequately verify that requests originate from legitimate users, allowing attackers to craft malicious web pages or links that cause authenticated users to perform unintended actions without their consent. In this case, the vulnerability allows an attacker to induce an authenticated user to submit unauthorized requests to the Stockie Extra application, potentially triggering actions that the user did not intend. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3 indicates a medium severity, with the vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N meaning the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction. The impact is limited to a low confidentiality loss, with no impact on integrity or availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches or fixes have been published at the time of this report. The vulnerability is significant in environments where users have elevated privileges or where sensitive operations can be triggered via web requests. Since Stockie Extra is a web-based product, the vulnerability could be exploited via social engineering or malicious websites targeting users logged into the application. The lack of authentication requirements for the attacker and the need for user interaction align with typical CSRF attack patterns. Organizations using Stockie Extra should prioritize implementing CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens, validating HTTP headers like Origin and Referer, and ensuring secure session management.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-64226 depends largely on the role Stockie Extra plays within their infrastructure. If Stockie Extra is used for critical business functions or handles sensitive data, the CSRF vulnerability could allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users, potentially leading to data leakage or unauthorized transactions. Although the confidentiality impact is rated low and there is no direct integrity or availability impact, the ability to manipulate user actions could facilitate indirect consequences such as privilege escalation or fraud if combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering tactics. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or malicious website visits are likely attack vectors, increasing risk in environments with less user security awareness. European organizations with web-facing Stockie Extra deployments are at risk of targeted attacks, especially in sectors like e-commerce, finance, or public services where the product might be integrated. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers often develop exploits after public disclosure. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation and maintain trust and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-64226 effectively, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Deploy anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing forms and API requests within Stockie Extra to ensure that requests originate from legitimate user sessions. 2) Validate the Origin and Referer HTTP headers on the server side to confirm requests come from trusted sources. 3) Enforce SameSite cookie attributes to restrict cookie transmission in cross-site contexts, reducing CSRF attack surface. 4) Educate users about the risks of phishing and the importance of not clicking on suspicious links while authenticated to Stockie Extra. 5) Limit user privileges within Stockie Extra to the minimum necessary, reducing the impact of any successful CSRF attack. 6) Monitor web server logs for unusual or unexpected requests that could indicate attempted exploitation. 7) Stay updated with vendor advisories and apply patches or updates as soon as they become available. 8) Consider implementing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of CSRF in the context of Stockie Extra and the operational environment of European organizations.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-64226: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in colabrio Stockie Extra
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in colabrio Stockie Extra stockie-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stockie Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.11.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-64226 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the colabrio Stockie Extra product, affecting all versions up to and including 1.2.11. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when a web application does not adequately verify that requests originate from legitimate users, allowing attackers to craft malicious web pages or links that cause authenticated users to perform unintended actions without their consent. In this case, the vulnerability allows an attacker to induce an authenticated user to submit unauthorized requests to the Stockie Extra application, potentially triggering actions that the user did not intend. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3 indicates a medium severity, with the vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N meaning the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction. The impact is limited to a low confidentiality loss, with no impact on integrity or availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches or fixes have been published at the time of this report. The vulnerability is significant in environments where users have elevated privileges or where sensitive operations can be triggered via web requests. Since Stockie Extra is a web-based product, the vulnerability could be exploited via social engineering or malicious websites targeting users logged into the application. The lack of authentication requirements for the attacker and the need for user interaction align with typical CSRF attack patterns. Organizations using Stockie Extra should prioritize implementing CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens, validating HTTP headers like Origin and Referer, and ensuring secure session management.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-64226 depends largely on the role Stockie Extra plays within their infrastructure. If Stockie Extra is used for critical business functions or handles sensitive data, the CSRF vulnerability could allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users, potentially leading to data leakage or unauthorized transactions. Although the confidentiality impact is rated low and there is no direct integrity or availability impact, the ability to manipulate user actions could facilitate indirect consequences such as privilege escalation or fraud if combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering tactics. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or malicious website visits are likely attack vectors, increasing risk in environments with less user security awareness. European organizations with web-facing Stockie Extra deployments are at risk of targeted attacks, especially in sectors like e-commerce, finance, or public services where the product might be integrated. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers often develop exploits after public disclosure. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation and maintain trust and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-64226 effectively, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Deploy anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing forms and API requests within Stockie Extra to ensure that requests originate from legitimate user sessions. 2) Validate the Origin and Referer HTTP headers on the server side to confirm requests come from trusted sources. 3) Enforce SameSite cookie attributes to restrict cookie transmission in cross-site contexts, reducing CSRF attack surface. 4) Educate users about the risks of phishing and the importance of not clicking on suspicious links while authenticated to Stockie Extra. 5) Limit user privileges within Stockie Extra to the minimum necessary, reducing the impact of any successful CSRF attack. 6) Monitor web server logs for unusual or unexpected requests that could indicate attempted exploitation. 7) Stay updated with vendor advisories and apply patches or updates as soon as they become available. 8) Consider implementing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of CSRF in the context of Stockie Extra and the operational environment of European organizations.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-29T03:08:02.189Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6901d65e86d093201c2b618e
Added to database: 10/29/2025, 8:54:54 AM
Last enriched: 1/20/2026, 11:45:51 PM
Last updated: 2/6/2026, 8:20:17 PM
Views: 53
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2065: Missing Authentication in Flycatcher Toys smART Pixelator
MediumCVE-2026-25640: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in pydantic pydantic-ai
HighCVE-2026-25641: CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition in nyariv SandboxJS
CriticalCVE-2026-25587: CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in nyariv SandboxJS
CriticalCVE-2026-25586: CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') in nyariv SandboxJS
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.