CVE-2025-64530: CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in apollographql federation
Apollo Federation is an architecture for declaratively composing APIs into a unified graph. A vulnerability in versions of Apollo Federation's composition logic prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 allowed some queries to Apollo Router to improperly bypass access controls on types/fields. Apollo Federation incorrectly allowed user-defined access control directives on interface types/fields, which could be bypassed by instead querying the implementing object types/fields in Apollo Router via inline fragments, for example. A fix to versions 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 of composition logic in Federation now disallows interfaces types and fields to contain user-defined access control directives. Some workarounds are available. Users of Apollo Rover with an unpatched composition version or are using the Apollo Studio build pipeline with Federation version 2.8 or below should manually copy the access control requirements on interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field where appropriate. Do not remove those access control requirements from the interface types/fields, as unpatched Apollo Composition will not automatically generate them in the supergraph schema. Customers not using Apollo Router access control features (`@authenticated`, `@requiresScopes`, or `@policy` directives) or not specifying access control requirements on interface types/fields are not affected and do not need to take action.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
Apollo Federation is a framework that composes multiple GraphQL APIs into a unified graph, enabling declarative API composition. The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-64530 (CWE-288) affects Apollo Federation's composition logic in versions prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1. The issue arises because Apollo Federation incorrectly allows user-defined access control directives (such as @authenticated, @requiresScopes, or @policy) to be applied on interface types and fields. However, Apollo Router, which executes queries against the federated graph, does not enforce these access controls correctly when queries use inline fragments to target the implementing object types/fields instead of the interface types/fields. This discrepancy enables an attacker to bypass access controls by crafting queries that circumvent the intended restrictions, effectively exposing protected data or functionality. The vulnerability does not require any authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network. The fix implemented in the patched versions disallows user-defined access control directives on interface types and fields, preventing this bypass. For users unable to upgrade immediately, a workaround involves manually copying access control directives from interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field to ensure consistent enforcement. Organizations not using Apollo Router access control features or not applying access controls on interface types/fields are not affected. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet, but the high CVSS score of 7.5 reflects the significant confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations leveraging Apollo Federation to compose GraphQL APIs, this vulnerability poses a serious risk of unauthorized data exposure. Attackers can bypass access controls and access sensitive information or restricted API fields without authentication, undermining confidentiality. This can lead to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR violations), and reputational damage. Since Apollo Federation is widely used in modern API architectures, especially in technology, finance, and e-commerce sectors prevalent in Europe, the impact can be broad. The vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability directly but compromises trust in API security. Organizations using Apollo Router with vulnerable versions and access control directives on interfaces are particularly vulnerable. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat level, potentially enabling attackers to gather intelligence or escalate attacks within federated API environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately assess their Apollo Federation versions and upgrade to patched releases 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, or 2.12.1 or later. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, they must manually replicate access control directives from interface types/fields to all implementing object types/fields to maintain enforcement consistency. Avoid removing access control directives from interfaces without applying them to implementing types, as this can worsen exposure. Review API schemas to identify use of @authenticated, @requiresScopes, or @policy directives on interfaces and fields. Implement strict monitoring and logging on Apollo Router queries to detect anomalous access patterns or inline fragment abuse. Limit network exposure of Apollo Router endpoints and enforce network-level access controls. Conduct thorough security testing of federated APIs to verify access control enforcement. Finally, educate development teams on secure schema design avoiding access control on interfaces until patched versions are deployed.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland, Belgium, Italy
CVE-2025-64530: CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in apollographql federation
Description
Apollo Federation is an architecture for declaratively composing APIs into a unified graph. A vulnerability in versions of Apollo Federation's composition logic prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 allowed some queries to Apollo Router to improperly bypass access controls on types/fields. Apollo Federation incorrectly allowed user-defined access control directives on interface types/fields, which could be bypassed by instead querying the implementing object types/fields in Apollo Router via inline fragments, for example. A fix to versions 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 of composition logic in Federation now disallows interfaces types and fields to contain user-defined access control directives. Some workarounds are available. Users of Apollo Rover with an unpatched composition version or are using the Apollo Studio build pipeline with Federation version 2.8 or below should manually copy the access control requirements on interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field where appropriate. Do not remove those access control requirements from the interface types/fields, as unpatched Apollo Composition will not automatically generate them in the supergraph schema. Customers not using Apollo Router access control features (`@authenticated`, `@requiresScopes`, or `@policy` directives) or not specifying access control requirements on interface types/fields are not affected and do not need to take action.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
Apollo Federation is a framework that composes multiple GraphQL APIs into a unified graph, enabling declarative API composition. The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-64530 (CWE-288) affects Apollo Federation's composition logic in versions prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1. The issue arises because Apollo Federation incorrectly allows user-defined access control directives (such as @authenticated, @requiresScopes, or @policy) to be applied on interface types and fields. However, Apollo Router, which executes queries against the federated graph, does not enforce these access controls correctly when queries use inline fragments to target the implementing object types/fields instead of the interface types/fields. This discrepancy enables an attacker to bypass access controls by crafting queries that circumvent the intended restrictions, effectively exposing protected data or functionality. The vulnerability does not require any authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network. The fix implemented in the patched versions disallows user-defined access control directives on interface types and fields, preventing this bypass. For users unable to upgrade immediately, a workaround involves manually copying access control directives from interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field to ensure consistent enforcement. Organizations not using Apollo Router access control features or not applying access controls on interface types/fields are not affected. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet, but the high CVSS score of 7.5 reflects the significant confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations leveraging Apollo Federation to compose GraphQL APIs, this vulnerability poses a serious risk of unauthorized data exposure. Attackers can bypass access controls and access sensitive information or restricted API fields without authentication, undermining confidentiality. This can lead to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR violations), and reputational damage. Since Apollo Federation is widely used in modern API architectures, especially in technology, finance, and e-commerce sectors prevalent in Europe, the impact can be broad. The vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability directly but compromises trust in API security. Organizations using Apollo Router with vulnerable versions and access control directives on interfaces are particularly vulnerable. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat level, potentially enabling attackers to gather intelligence or escalate attacks within federated API environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately assess their Apollo Federation versions and upgrade to patched releases 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, or 2.12.1 or later. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, they must manually replicate access control directives from interface types/fields to all implementing object types/fields to maintain enforcement consistency. Avoid removing access control directives from interfaces without applying them to implementing types, as this can worsen exposure. Review API schemas to identify use of @authenticated, @requiresScopes, or @policy directives on interfaces and fields. Implement strict monitoring and logging on Apollo Router queries to detect anomalous access patterns or inline fragment abuse. Limit network exposure of Apollo Router endpoints and enforce network-level access controls. Conduct thorough security testing of federated APIs to verify access control enforcement. Finally, educate development teams on secure schema design avoiding access control on interfaces until patched versions are deployed.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-11-05T21:15:39.401Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 691672127c4d52e6fb3b2e82
Added to database: 11/14/2025, 12:04:34 AM
Last enriched: 11/14/2025, 12:04:48 AM
Last updated: 11/14/2025, 4:06:53 AM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-13161: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in IQ Service International IQ-Support
HighCVE-2025-13160: CWE-497 Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in IQ Service International IQ-Support
MediumCVE-2025-9479: Out of bounds read in Google Chrome
UnknownCVE-2025-13107: Inappropriate implementation in Google Chrome
UnknownCVE-2025-13102: Inappropriate implementation in Google Chrome
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.