CVE-2025-6476VulnerabilityPublished 22 Jun 2025Updated 23 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6476: SourceCodester Gym Management System · Cross-Site Request Forgery

Affects SourceCodester Gym Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 22 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SourceCodester Gym Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Implement Anti-CSRF Tokens: Developers and administrators should ensure that all state-changing requests require a valid anti-CSRF token that is unique per user session and verified server-side. 2. Enforce SameSite Cookies: Configure session cookies with the 'SameSite' attribute set to 'Strict' or 'Lax' to reduce the risk of CSRF attacks via cross-origin requests. 3. Require User Interaction Confirmation: For sensitive operations, require explicit user confirmation (e.g., re-authentication or CAPTCHA) to mitigate automated CSRF attempts. 4. Update or Patch: Monitor SourceCodester’s official channels for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly. 5. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy WAF rules to detect and block suspicious CSRF attack patterns targeting the gym management system. 6. User Awareness: Educate users and administrators about the risks of CSRF and encourage cautious behavior regarding unsolicited links or emails. 7. Restrict Access: Limit access to the gym management system to trusted networks or VPNs where feasible to reduce exposure. 8. Audit Logs: Enable detailed logging of user actions to detect unusual or unauthorized activities that may indicate exploitation attempts.

Description

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using SourceCodester Gym Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized actions being performed on their gym management platforms. Potential impacts include manipulation of user accounts, unauthorized changes to membership or billing information, and disruption of normal business operations. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, integrity is at risk, which could lead to data inconsistencies, financial discrepancies, or reputational damage if customer data is altered improperly. Given the public disclosure and ease of remote exploitation without authentication, attackers could target multiple organizations, especially smaller gyms or fitness centers that may lack robust security controls. The medium severity rating suggests that while the threat is not critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation. European organizations relying on this software for member management, billing, or scheduling could face operational disruptions or customer trust issues if exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 22 Jun 2025, 13:04 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats