VulnerabilityPublished 23 Jun 2025Updated 26 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6531: SIFUSM BD S1 · Improper Access Controls

Affects SIFUSM BD S1Source CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SIFUSM BD S1	Affected =20250611	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should implement network-level mitigations. First, isolate all SIFUSM BD S1 devices on dedicated VLANs or subnetworks with strict access controls to prevent unauthorized lateral movement within the network. Employ network segmentation to separate dashcams from critical infrastructure and sensitive data repositories. Use firewall rules to restrict RTSP traffic to only authorized management stations or monitoring systems. Regularly audit network traffic to detect anomalous access patterns to RTSP endpoints. If possible, disable RTSP streaming on the devices if not required or replace the devices with models from vendors with better security track records. Additionally, enforce strong physical security controls to prevent unauthorized local network access, such as securing Wi-Fi access points and network ports. Monitor vendor communications for firmware updates or patches addressing this vulnerability and plan prompt deployment once available. Finally, educate staff about the risks of connecting unauthorized devices to corporate networks.

Description

A vulnerability was found in SIFUSM/MZZYG BD S1 up to 20250611. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component RTSP Live Video Stream Endpoint. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. Access to the local network is required for this attack to succeed. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This dashcam is distributed by multiple resellers and different names.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary risk lies in unauthorized access to live video streams from these dashcams, potentially leading to privacy violations and leakage of sensitive visual information. This could affect companies using these dashcams for fleet management, security monitoring, or other operational purposes. Exposure of live video feeds could facilitate reconnaissance by malicious actors, enabling further targeted attacks or physical security breaches. Since the vulnerability requires local network access, the threat is more pronounced in environments where network segmentation is weak or where these devices are connected to corporate or sensitive networks without adequate isolation. The improper access controls could also undermine trust in the device's security, potentially leading to regulatory compliance issues under GDPR if personal data is compromised. However, the lack of impact on device integrity or availability limits the scope of disruption to confidentiality concerns.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…